Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-27-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 05-27-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 10:00:47 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 9:57:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/27/1986
Meeting Type
Special Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT' <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: JAMES AND MYRA DIRKMAN REZONING <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" Indicates compliance'- "No" indicates Noncompliance <br /> PLANNING STAFF <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON PLANNING <br /> BOARD <br /> Ordinance Requi rements SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in Article 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include: <br /> 20.32 a) Map snowing affected Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of <br /> I"=100' <br /> property at scale of not less Yes No <br /> than I '= 100" nor more than I '= <br /> 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No <br /> property Description provided with application Yes No <br /> 20. 3.2 c) Explanation of alleged -_Yes No No error alleged <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by Yes No <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20. 3.2 d) Changed conditions , if X Yes No Applicant cites adjacent non- <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- Yes No <br /> residential land uses and traffic <br /> bly necessary to promote public impacts resulting in the unsuitability <br /> health , safety and general welfare; of the property for residential use , <br /> 20° 3.2 e) Manner in which proposed X Yes No Property is located in a 20 Year <br /> amendment wilt carry out purpose Transition Area and Commercial/ Yes No <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive Industrial Node <br /> Plan, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.