Agenda - 05-05-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

08i DRAFT JPH MINUTES PAGE 5 issuance of a permit. She looks at the eceing streamvs characteristics and nature and specifiesvthe level at which the plant must operate to meet the standard for the stream. Lloyd continued Inquiring if the Hillsborough treatment plant was one of the most modern and efficient treatment plants in the southeast. Kirk responded she could not say. Commissioner Carey inquired when the permit was up for renewal . Kirk responded early 1987. STATEMENT BY THE TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH idayor Frank Sheffield ld presented the of position the Town Hillsborough p statement of Development. The statemenwas read onIn its entirety. A copy of the statement t entirety.attached minutes. on pages utes, of Wilihoit asked for clarification of the safe yield of the combined reservoirs of 2.6 mgd whichntwould increase to something more than 4 mgd. He Mr. Cordell if the inquired o he figure now being discussed of Cordell responded there u ssng iq 3.ed. were many numbers asked that 4 mgd be s being quoted. 9 thought of as a theoretical maximum utilization of the three reservoirs on the Eno River. Willhoit noted that he uncertainity that goes along with an estimate the felt they should try to deal with a single but al fl le figure. Wray noted 9 theoretical Y ed that he felt the figure 4 arrived at based on some catastrophic as was "see what we can do situation" exercise and the State does not recommends that hwithtithe existing system and these changes made that this be counted upon as a dependable number. Willhoit referred to the handout that showed the capacity of the supply versus demand in which the figure 3.75 was listed. He asked if the 3.75 is basically the same as the figure 4 mgd referred to. Wray responded it was supposed to be the same figure, but that it could possibly need some adjustments and very Ilkley could be less than the 4 mgd. Planning Board member Yuhasz inquired what "safe yield" means. Wray responded it was a statistical you are willing to accept. calculation figdee a depends on the level of risk that is acceptable. ray dtte that 2.2 was a conservative figure meaning 1 Y state that f 50 year range. Wray noted again that the figures ut4 �0 and 3.75 were theoretical figures for catastrophic situations and not intended to be used as a basis, but for some extreme emergency. planning much risk was in the 2.6 safe yieid.CaWrayaresponded that 2.6 was a figure you would drop back from during conservation periods and the yield is less during the extreme conservation periods. That figure was given as a normal yield. Marshall inquired if NRCD was going to