Agenda - 05-05-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• 077; • Page 16 Shanklin inquired why there was no- nescape clausen if the water crises is solved. Smith responded the • condition also addresses the impacts of the total project over time.. Kramer noted a water policy Is needed to guide the decisions of the Board. Walters questioned why the project is bound to conditions others are not tied to. Kramer expressed concern with the tinkering with unresolved .Issues. Smith reviewed the staff options provided for conditions /41 . Collins commented on annexation requirements and the general rule of thumb that projects be 60% built-out. The Board discussed phase related conditions. MOTION: Kramer moved approval of option a) .- seconded the motion. Shanklin VOTE: Unanimous. The Board discussed condition #43. recommended its deletion as the property onine served has other access. ' Y io be VOTE: 7 in favor 1 opposed - Best MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the addition of a condition requiring consultation with the Hillsborough Postmaster for the provision of mail service. Kramer seconded the motion. VOTE: Unanimous Kramer expressed opposition to the project on the basis of a lack of clarity with the water issue and traffic problems. He felt he could not act on the proposal in any form in the absence of a water policy. MOTION: Kramer moved that the Board ask the Commissioners to develop a water County consideration of approval of Scotswoodiory any iother pending projects that require water and sewer from Hillsborough. Margison seconded the motion. Smith questioned the application of this proposal to the Town of Hillsborough 's subdivision projects. Collins determined that these projects would also be subject to these decisions. VOTE : 3 in favor - Pilkey, Kramer, Margison 5 opposed Motion failed Jacobs noted that the Planning Board could Itself work on developing such a water policy, and that