Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
D7 <br /> _ Page 14 <br /> responsible. Yuhasz responded the applicant is not <br /> solely responsible as the first developer but <br /> should only share part of the burden. <br /> VOTE: <br /> 4 in favor -. Margison, Pilkey, Jacobs, Best <br /> 4 opposed - Yuhasz, Shanklin•, Kramer, Walters. <br /> The Board noted that the issues here were the <br /> length of improvements and the timing of <br /> construction of the turn lane. <br /> Smith informed the Board that NCOOT had verified it <br /> wanted no involvement by a developer in the <br /> installation or financing of traffic lights. Best <br /> concurred with the staff on NCDOT's position. <br /> MOTION: Best , moved deletion of condition #20. <br /> seconded the motion. Kramer <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved extension of the meeting <br /> minutes. Pilkey seconded the motion: for twenty <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> Shanklin inquired if #22 should refer to both <br /> Carolina Avenue and Second Street. <br /> The Board directed that the references be <br /> corrected. <br /> The Board discussed condition #23. Jacobs asked <br /> about Town standards. Smith responded there are <br /> none. <br /> Pilkey asked what size was implied on Condition <br /> #24. Smith responded there was no information from <br /> the Town. <br /> Yuhasz questioned how far along St. Mary's was <br /> Intended by condition #24. <br /> There was no discussion of conditions #25 — 28. . <br /> The Board discussed #29. <br /> Jacobs questioned ( h) noting "wherever possible" <br /> should read "wherever appropriate", <br /> Waiters expressed concern with 1-he convenience of <br /> access for bikes and dirt bikes to these recreation <br /> areas. Collins suggested entrance obstruction. <br /> Yuhasz noted wheelchair access Is required.. <br /> Margison expressed a desire for shaded areas in the <br /> tot lots. <br />