Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 05-05-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 9:31:02 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 9:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Page 1 _= <br /> ,,. 071-:::--"-...7-1 <br /> Best noted that:. curb and gutter required less <br /> maintenance, defines the street and provides <br /> protection for pedestrians. <br /> VOTE: 2 in favor <br /> 6 Opposed _ Shanklin, Yuhasz <br /> Motion fails. <br /> MOTION: Best moved to amend condition <br /> turning 18 to specify. that <br /> the urning lane on hestun Burin St. Mary's Road should be <br /> g construction of Graham Drive. <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> The Board accepted the staff revision to #10 b <br /> consensus, by <br /> There was no comment on conditions #13-15. <br /> MOTION: Walters moved the deletion <br /> seconded the motion, of #16. Shanklin <br /> VOTE: 6 in favor <br /> 2 opposed - Best, Jacobs <br /> Collins expressed concern to the Board that by this <br /> condition the staff is attempting to tie <br /> developments together: He noted that the Board has <br /> voted both ways on this kind of issue and that the <br /> . staff needs better direction from the Board. <br /> There was no comment on condition 117. <br /> MOTION: Best moved approval PP oval that condition 118 be amended <br /> to require that the improvements be constructed <br /> immediately upon initial construction of the <br /> project. hiargison seconded the motion. <br /> Walters cited cost factors. <br /> Best cited safety <br /> Kramer questioned at which time this requirement is <br /> reasonable. <br /> Yuhasz questioned the requirement that turn <br /> be constructed beyond the propert l lanes y s frontage. <br /> Smith clarified Ihz,I; the ;-hird lane serves as a <br /> turn lane and would be of no purpose without the <br /> direct entrances/exits on U5 70. <br /> Yuhasz asked staff if extensions beyond the site <br /> were required previously. Smith responded no. <br /> Best asked if that is an issue. <br /> yes. Best suggested the a Kramer to applicant needed t <br /> ed to harnma <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.