Agenda - 05-05-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• o(3 • Page 5 • Margison suggested there was testimony that the Board may not have the true picture. Collins clarified his statement in the memorandum . regarding the lack of - information to make. an objective 'statement as being specifically related to the staging plan and solutions proposed to address the availability issue. VOTE: . 4 in favor - Shanklin, Yuhasz, Palters, Kramer 4 opposed -- Pilkey, Margison, Jacobs, Best MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 8.2.4 b) . Pilkey seconded the motion . VOTE: 7 in favor. 1 opposed - Best. Best expressed concern with the need for Increased services. MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 8.2.4 c) Yuhasz seconded the motion. Best cited accident reports and suggested- that improvements to the roads would not necessarily make the roads safe. Walters suggested road improvements at Cameron Park School . Shanklin felt the applicant should not be held responsible for a design flaw at the intersection of St. Mary 's and US �-� 70 given the acute angle at the crossing. He expressed a concern with the lack of NCDOT' s action prior to a problem reaching a severe level . Kramer expressed concern with traffic moving south. Pilkey expressed concern with internal traffic conditions. Yuhasz noted that limiting access points means more internal back—up. Margison expressed concern with traffic on East King Street. Yuhasz felt that all the traffic problems could not be attributed to even a project of this size. Kramer agreed that there was no direct impact except on St. Mary 's. Yuhasz maintained that the applicants addressed this situation as much as they could in their proposal . VOTE: 3 in favor -- Shanklin, Walker, Yuhasz 5 opposed Motion failed.