Agenda - 05-05-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

•- • 02; Article 8.2.2 states that where a preponderance of evidence indicates compliance with the general standards, specific rules governing the specific use, and that the use complies with all required regulations and standards, the application must be approved unless it is found, in some specific manner that: 1 . The use will not promote the public health, safety and general welfare if located where proposed and developed and operated according to the plan as submitted; 2. The use will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous property; 3. The use is not in compliance with the general plans for the physical development of the county as embodied in these regulations or in the Comprehensive Plan, or portion thereof, adopted by the Orange County Board of Commissioners. The burden of proving one or more of the above findings is on those opposing the application. The proof must also be in the form of competent material and substantial evidence. The Planning Staff reviewed the application, the site plan and all supporting documentation and found that no information was received which would established grounds for making one or more of the above findings. The Planning Board has reviewed the application, the site plan, all supporting documentation and the evidence received at public hearing and has found that the applicant does not comply with the general standard #1 regarding the public health, standard and welfare nor with the specific rules and required regulations referenced as 8.2.4 c) , 20.3.2 e) , and 7. 15. 10 a) 2. The Planning Board, therefore, recommends denial of the request. However, should the Board of Commissioners approve the request the Planning Board recommends the attachment of conditions to the approval as follows: