Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
• <br /> p' w <br /> 012 . <br /> • Motion'was made by Chair Willhoit,. seconded by Commissioner <br /> Marshall to continue the public hearing' until March 18, 1986. <br /> 3 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br /> 4 • <br /> 5 VERNON P. DAVIS <br /> 6 COMMERCIAL - 2 - AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL . TO NEIGHBORHOOD <br /> 7 PRESENTATION BY STAFF act statement is in the The im p <br /> 8 -agenda file in the Clerk's Office). permanent <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Planner Susan Smith presented for the receipt of public <br /> 11 comment a proposed rezoning request submitted by Vernon P. Davis for one <br /> = 12 (1) acre located on the south side of NC Highway 54, east of the Gulf <br /> 13 Station/Store and west of Larry's Alignment Shop in Bingham' Township. <br /> 14 The site has direct access onto NC Highway 54. The road is designated <br /> 15 as an arterial in the Land Use Plan. The property is currently <br /> 16 designated as A-R and as- Rural Community Activity Node in the Orange <br /> 17 County Land Use Plan. The present zoning classification of the property <br /> ,8 is A-R. The applicant is requesting _ <br /> st' <br /> 19 Approval of the request would allow for limited tcommercial edevelopment <br /> 20 use at this location. The property is presently located in an area <br /> '21 designated as Rural Community Transition Activity Node in the Land Use <br /> 22 Plan with property immediately to the east and west zoned A-R <br /> 23 Susan Smith made reference to the impact statement regarding <br /> 24 water and wastewater services, roads/traffic, e <br /> ads traff' <br /> / lc, olice <br /> 25 services, relationship between Land Use Plan and ZoninglOrdinance, and <br /> 26 permitted uses. <br /> The applicant has complied with all the criteria for rezoning <br /> and the staff recommends approval of the request. <br /> 29 _COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OR PLANNING BOARD <br /> 30 Dr. Kizer questioned the total amount of land zoned commercial <br /> 31 in the activity node. He stated that the requested rezoning would. <br /> 32 exceed the five acres limit specified for the district and the node. <br /> 33 ' He questioned the amount of acreage included in- the zoning <br /> 34 request and noted a discrepancy. <br /> 35 PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT <br /> 36 Vernon Davis indicated that a larger rezonin g reques <br /> 37 years ago was denied because in the business node there was onlytsolmuch <br /> 38 commercial acreage allowed so the acreage requested for rezoning was <br /> 39 reduced to meet the requirements. <br /> ho <br /> hi WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 4. ALLEN AND DORIS TURNER REZONING <br /> 44 Barry Jacobs announced that this reque st was w <br /> 45 i thdxa;vn, <br /> 46 <br /> 47 5. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS (A copy of the proposed text <br /> 48 amendments is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . <br /> 49 a. ARTICLE 20 - AMENDMENTS - 30 DAY REVIEW PERIOD) <br /> 50 Planner Susan Smith summarized the proposed amendments to <br /> 51 Article 20 as identified on the agenda as itm 5a. <br /> 52 NO COMMENTS <br /> b. ARTICLE 4 - PERMITTED USES -- ADD "MASSAGE BUSINESS" <br /> c. ARTICLE 4 - PERMITTED USES - DELETE "ADULT USES" <br /> 55 d. ARTICLE 6 - DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS - REQUIREMENTS FOR <br /> 56 MASSAGE BUSINESSES <br />