Orange County NC Website
01C <br /> - __ -a-ay-B�. mac.- t , .M1"1u <br /> 5 <br /> that most of the trees in the area that were clearcut were dead or <br /> rotten. All of this was done before Cheeks was zoned. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 WITH NO FURTHER COMMENTS, THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 This item was referred to the Planning Board for their recommendation. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 1012. HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS - R-1 to R-2 <br /> 9 PRESENTATION BY STAFF (A copy. of the impact statement is in the <br /> 10 permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . <br /> 11 Planner Susan Smith presented for receipt of public comment <br /> 12 the rezoning request submitted by Piedmont Atlantic, . Inc. Piedmont <br /> 13 Atlantic Inc. is requesting a general rezoning of property located north. <br /> 14 of Homestead Road and 400 feet west of the intersection of Homestead <br /> 15 Road and Rogers Road in Chapel Hill Township. The parcel contains 49.17 <br /> 16 acres or 2,141,845.2 square feet. It is located within an area <br /> i7 designated Ten- Year and Twenty- year Transition areas. Approximately 15% <br /> 18 of the property is located within the Ten Year Transition Area. The <br /> 19 present zoning of the property is Residential--1 (R-1) . The proposed <br /> 20 Joint Planning Area Plan designates this area as Suburban Residential <br /> 21 which corresponds to residential densities of two to five dwelling units <br /> 22 per acre. Rezoning of the property would allow the development of the <br /> 23 property in half-acre single-family residential lots. <br /> 24 Susan Smith made reference to the impact statement with regard <br /> 25 to water and wastewater systems, roads/traffic, police, fire and rescue <br /> services, schools, and permitted uses. <br /> The Planning Staff found that the applicant complied -with all the <br /> applicable regulations and standards for a R-2 district and recommends <br /> 29 approval of the general rezoning request. <br /> 30 PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT <br /> 31 Buzz Lloyd, Secretary of Piedmont Atlantic Corporation, made <br /> 32 reference to a letter from Carrboro. In that letter they referred to <br /> 33 "steep slopes". He stated that 10% of the tract has slopes in excess of <br /> 34 15%. A lot of the land is wooded and suited for residential homes. <br /> 35 There is a need for this type of housing in the Chapel Hill area and <br /> 36 they would like to address that need. He cited the location of this <br /> 37 tract of land as a definite asset. The housing will range from $125,000 <br /> 38 to $200,000 price range. <br /> 39 Chair Willhoit cited problems associated with the development <br /> 4o of the land use plan for that area. This area is in the Carrboro Joint <br /> 41 Planning Area and yet it is remote from the city limits. He asked for <br /> 42 comments on a possible scenario if this request is approved and the <br /> 43 subdivision built. Would it be voluntarily annexed by Carrboro or <br /> 44 would it be annexed by Chapel Hill? <br /> 45 Buzz Lloyd indicated his choice of a scenario would be where <br /> 46 the County would grant the zoning, the development would be built and <br /> 47 they would not be involved with seeking annexation. <br /> 48 Planning Board member Chris Best asked about the school the <br /> 49 children from this area would attend and was told they would attend <br /> 50 Chapel Hill-Carrboro Schools. Be questioned if the developer.. was <br /> 51 concerned that the schools were already operating at capacity and Buzz <br /> 5?,� Lloyd indicated that the development is not gaged by the schools but <br /> 5 hat by the time more schools will be necessary they will be built. <br /> 51 Chair Willhoit outlined the costs involved for providing <br /> 55 school space for additional children that this development would <br /> 56 generate. More classrooms will be needed which means taxes will need <br />