Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 05-05-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 9:31:02 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 9:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS <br /> CI <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF Q <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS; +� <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECI F1 C STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates com l iance; "No" indicates Noncompliance <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE.,SUOMI TTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS,, RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance Requi rernents FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> fied in Article 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include., <br /> r <br /> 20.32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less 1"=100' <br /> than I '= 100" nor more than 1 '= <br /> 20' <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description of XYes No Description provided with a licat-ion Yes No <br /> property — P P <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged _Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, if any, to be corrected by --- -- <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20.3.2 d) Changed conditions, if X Yes No Applicant cites rapid growth in Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- — Chapel Hall/Carrboro area and shortage - -' <br /> bly necessary to promote public of single-family residential development <br /> health, safety and general welfare. sites. <br /> 20.3.2 e) Manner in which proposed X Yes No Applicant notes property is located Yes No <br /> amendment grill carry out purpose within an area designated ten and <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive Twenty Year Transition Area on the adopted plan <br /> Plan, and designated for suburban residential development at <br /> 2-5 units per acre on the proposed JPA plan. <br /> 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.