Agenda - 05-05-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

1U DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 25 was in anticipation of rezoning. Collins added it was also in anticipation of . Hillsborough 's approval of the water and sewer plans. VTOE: Unanimous. MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on 7.4. 1 (Streets) . Seconded by Yuhasz. VOTE: Unanimous. MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on 7.4.2 (Utilities) . Seconded by Walters. Best expressed a concern that there would be a cost to the taxpayers due to the necessity of upgrading lines In order to purchase water from the City of Burlington. Yuhasz responded that could happen if Scotswood is the only development to come in and no other development is approved that uses water and sewer. Yuhasz noted that this particular development is not responsible for the cost of upgrading water lines in order to purchase water from the City of Burlington. Collins commented that if there was no more development in the County at all there is still a water problem to be addressed by the upgrading of lines. S Pilkey inquired about stormwater drainage and the possibility of higher net public cost. Collins responded that no evidence was presented at the public hearing that indicated there would be an increase in net public cost. Kizer noted that there is not a development anywhere which would not result in some increase in public cost in the provision of services and expressed a concern that emphasis on this point was non-sensicai . Yuhasz commented that such developments generate additional tax revenues. He added that there are many factors that determine net public cost. Hubbard responded that the costs are borne by the public in advance of the receipt of revenues associated with the development. VOTE: 8 in favor. 3 opposed (Best, Jacobs, Hubbard) , MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on 7.4.3 (Hazards) and 7 . 14.3 (Site planning standards external ) . Seconded by Pilkey. VOTE: Unanimous.