Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
104 <br /> DRAFT PLANNING BOARD MINUTES 24 <br /> 6 opposed. (Kramer, Best, Hubbard, Margison, <br /> Pilkey, Jacobs) . <br /> Walters felt that those opposing the motion had <br /> not proven their point adding that one could not <br /> assume that everyone must travel to work at 55 mph <br /> on every road at all times. He continued that <br /> these decisions effectively deny the project. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on 20.3.2 a) b) <br /> (Rezoning application materials) . Seconded by <br /> Yuhasz. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved positive findings on 20.3.2 e) <br /> (Land Use Plan) . Seconded by Yuhasz. <br /> Pilkey expressed concern in the Land Use Plan with <br /> spacing requirements for commercial uses. Lewis <br /> suggested that the commercial proposal would keep <br /> residents of the development off US 70. Best <br /> commented that there was only one access to the <br /> commercial area from the development and, <br /> therefore, this was not truly a commercial area <br /> for Scotswood. <br /> Kramer asked if the size was different would that <br /> impact Best's decision . Best responded yes. <br /> Yuhasz added that Pilkey seemed concerned with <br /> uses ie. the grocery store adding that such a <br /> facility would serve the community. <br /> Collins asked the Board members to cite the <br /> provision in the ordinance regarding spacing of <br /> commercial uses. Jacobs read Section 7. 15 . 1 of <br /> the Zoning Ordinance. Smith indicated that that <br /> provision did not set a spacing standard . <br /> VOTE: 5 in favor. (Walters, Lewis, Yuhasz, Shanklin, <br /> Kizer) <br /> 6 opposed. (Kramer, Best, Hubbard, Margison, <br /> Pilkey, Jacobs) <br /> MOTION: Kizer moved positive findings on all findings <br /> related to Sections 4.2.3 a) b ) c) , 4.2.3 a) b) c) <br /> d ) and 4.2. 11 a) b) c) (Criteria for PD-H-R2, PD <br /> H-R5 and PD(C)-GC-4 zoning districts) . Seconded by <br /> Walters. <br /> Margison questioned the wording "could be" in <br /> reference to provision of water and sewer <br /> facilities. Kizer responded that this provision <br />