Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-05-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 05-05-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2016 9:31:02 AM
Creation date
9/22/2016 9:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/5/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT JPH MINUTES <br /> NUTES <br /> 0$4 PAGE 13 <br /> Wray noted that a response could be <br /> work load, but that -some of given depending would be on <br /> Judgment calls, f the answers would be <br /> assumptions were needed �onh which nto:basehthe model . <br /> Lloyd asked if this recommendation would be applicable other areas as well . Wray responded that one example was the recently completed project by tymp f <br /> Durham. He noted that much more Y the Bing of <br /> released in that project,. He than 7Q10 was being <br /> of .4 with no in-stream noted that the difference <br /> recommended for Orange County. is the figure . being <br /> the water does not belong y' He stressed again that <br /> there Is the right to use it. <br /> anyone in particular but <br /> Willhoit i <br /> ere noted ths a <br /> .should anteds ereesl policy question that the Board <br /> .whether •that point g the cutoff point to OWASA; <br /> .water shortage in northernfOrange eCount <br /> phase down process is used, a significant <br /> u Wray responded that whether a <br /> be a judgement call . Wra <br /> becommudgemint was a "sharing"Willhoit noted that the Manager's of reservoirs were drawn doncludin the cut-back but the <br /> a complete cud-off on the transfer a tot~back but ray <br /> responded that the study transfer fio OWASA. Wray <br /> Basin given that correlating the data stay within the Eno River <br /> difficult if not impos siblegotherwise. <br /> would be <br /> very <br /> office to Billingsley noted that he would like to work with Wray' <br /> could be reached in this complex problem <br /> erle s <br /> alternatives . <br /> Willhoit stated that he understood that the modeling was <br /> necessary to development <br /> responded that his office could management <br /> Pion within the Eno River, deal with aprr+anagemcnt <br /> Durham connection with OWASA Willhoit noted that <br /> as it needed to be explored again <br /> seems to be a critical link . 9 <br /> conservation and noted that Mayor Sheffield mentioned <br /> that the Town of Hillsborough is had stated <br /> issue. He also noted that the county to explore that <br /> is enforcing the current Y plumbing <br /> requires the state plumbing code inspector <br /> r quires, installation of low-volume code whing <br /> He also indicated thermg t plumbing <br /> some design type standards that could be possibly or <br /> the conservation of water, developed for <br /> W i l l h o i t noted that the engineering <br /> cf University Lake needed to work on the by-pass <br /> of ni ersity Hillsborough ken' proceed and that th Town <br /> with the Lake Ben Johnson amodificationr, gain <br /> the cost effectivenes 9 to proceed <br /> s of raising the n added angt <br /> from heke November <br /> needs to be reviewed as the figures <br /> 15, 1985 statement reads $32,000 and the The No stated <br /> at this public hearing was $100,000. figure stated <br /> Willhoit continued that the <br /> Burlington connection needed togproceedgasw on the <br /> well as <br /> the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.