Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
18 <br /> CHCCS Maximum Supportable Impact Fees: <br /> - Max supportable fees per unit calculated by multiplying SGR x net capital cost per <br /> student <br /> - For example: Elementary 0.150 (0-3 bedroom SFU) x net cost of$36,871 <br /> per student = $5,530 per unit for elementary capital facilities <br /> - Another Option: County could adopt fees that consolidate bdrm count subcategories <br /> within a broader housing unit category. <br /> - Single Family Detached homes, currently divided into two subcategories (0-3 <br /> Bedrooms and 4+ Bedrooms), could be single fee regardless of size. <br /> - If the County decides to pursue option, average impact fee by type of unit <br /> provided would be used. <br /> Perdita Holtz, Planning Department, made the following PowerPoint presentation: <br /> 2016 School Impact Fee Studies <br /> September 6, 2016 BOCC Meeting <br /> Refined Housing Type Categories <br /> • Disaggregated data down to number of bedrooms per unit (SFD, SFA, MF) <br /> • Calculations for smaller-sized single-family detached (<800 square feet) <br /> • Age-Restricted Units <br /> Illustration of Fees - CHCCS <br /> Illustration of Fees - OCS <br /> Proposed Steps to Update School Impact Fee Levels <br /> Recommendation for Tonight <br /> • Receive the draft studies. <br /> • Hear the presentation by the consultant and Planning staff. <br /> • Discuss the topic as desired. <br /> • Direct staff to proceed with the outlined schedule and Ordinance updates. <br /> • Set a public hearing for the October 4, 2016 BOCC meeting. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs asked if this applies solely to new construction. <br /> Perdita Holtz said yes. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said there was an issue years ago, where someone purchased a <br /> unit, paid an impact fee, moved the house to a new lot, and was charged another impact fee. <br /> Malcolm Munkittrick said in his opinion another impact fee should not be paid. <br /> John Roberts said he presented this to the Board in 2012, and the BOCC did not <br /> approve the amendment. He said the reason behind the additional impact fee is that, if <br /> development on the prior property is not restricted in any way, then it has an impact as a new <br /> building could be constructed on that property. He said to avoid a second impact fee there <br /> would need to be an easement or some development restriction placed on the prior location of <br /> the moved structure. He said the BOCC did not approve the amendment and made no other <br /> change. <br />