Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-22-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 04-22-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 12:28:10 PM
Creation date
9/20/2016 4:46:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/22/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
05€ <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 3-17 _86 <br /> PAGE 19 <br /> water. Smith responded the plat is in order and no <br /> other adjustment would need to be made. <br /> Gordon noted she felt consistency was important and <br /> making Wildwood wait and yet approving this <br /> subdivision would be hard to explain. P <br /> responded that Wildwood did not have the options of <br /> wells given the lot size. <br /> Pearson noted serving the site with public water <br /> was cheaper than serving the site with individual <br /> wells . <br /> Horton noted that it was to his economic and <br /> marketing advantage to be served by city water. <br /> Jacobs noted that staff had recommended an 8" water <br /> line . Smith responded that ultimately the line <br /> size is up to the Town of Hillsborough. She <br /> commented that adding such conditions is redundant <br /> and can be misleading given that the utility <br /> providers have the final say. <br /> VOTE: (Motion to table) <br /> 4 in favor. <br /> 7 opposed . <br /> Motion failed . <br /> AMENDED MOTION: <br /> Gordon moved approval of the request and in the <br /> (By Gordon) event that the developer does decide to <br /> with public water that the staff of eed <br /> water line be imposed . <br /> Kramer wished to add as a condition the reference <br /> by the Recreation Department to "appropriate <br /> restrictive covenants" . Seconded by Pilkey. <br /> Pilkey inquired about underground power lines . <br /> Smith responded that this requirement was not <br /> enforceable through the current Subdivision <br /> Regulations . <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor. <br /> 2 opposed (Best, Jacobs) <br /> —,)4E- f. BURNSIDE PARK - PRELIMINARY <br /> Presentation by Kirk . <br /> The purpose of this agenda item is to consider <br /> approval of the Preliminary Plan for Burnside Park <br /> Subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.