Orange County NC Website
092 <br /> • • <br /> • <br /> 9 <br /> This amendment has some significant impacts on what will be set out for <br /> the other townships. He voiced opposition to the GC-4 exemption in <br /> calculating the amount of commercial land in a specific area. The design <br /> criteria describing a local: commercial node were intend uses equivalent <br /> to a "Mom and Pop" store or a local service station. The problem with <br /> EC-5 is that,. as was done in some areas, certain nodes were designated <br /> which include the GC-5 designation to try to take into account the fact <br /> that the existing businesses were already there. Some of these <br /> businesses can be quite large and, by the time you add those and if you <br /> raise the maximum again for LC-1, you have eighteen acres plus • whatever <br /> was already there and the node is no longer a small commercial node in a <br /> rural area. By doing this, the intent of the nodes is changed. To <br /> calculate all the commercial uses when assessing the character of the <br /> node and not allow to exemptions can result in quite a large commercial <br /> area. <br /> r. ARTICLE 4 - PERMITTED USES - ASSEMBLY/PACKAGING OPERATIONS <br /> s. ARTICLE 8 - SPECIAL USES - ASSEMBLY/PACKAGING OPERATIONS <br /> t. ARTICLE T - ARTICLE 20 - DEFINITIONS - ASSEMBLY/PACKAGING <br /> OPERATIONS, <br /> Planner Susan Smith continued with items 5r through 5t as <br /> identified in the agenda. With reference to Article 4 - Establishment <br /> of Permitted Use Table, Article 8-Special Use Permits and'Article 22- - <br /> Definitions, Smith indicated these amendments would provide specifically <br /> for assembly and packaging operations, including mail order houses. <br /> Amendments to Article 4 would specify where those uses would be <br /> permitted, the amendment to Article 8 would specify the standards to <br /> evaluate those requests for a Special Use Permit, and Article 22 would <br /> define such uses. <br /> Steve Kizer indicated that some of the same comments he made above <br /> would apply to these proposed amendments. These amendments are in <br /> reaction to the fact that the Zoning Ordinance actually worked with <br /> respect to the request for P & S Sales. The problem is that a simple <br /> packaging plant has an awful lot of input that comes to it and is not a <br /> minor operation. The parking lot at P & S sales has about 100 cars and <br /> is a major operation. The whole point of these smaller nodes was to <br /> make sure that large enterprises that would be out of character with the <br /> surrounding community are not placed there. A commercial development in <br /> a rural node could be quite large and not in keeping with the idea that <br /> these are supposed to be small <br /> commercial operations. This adjustment should not be made until it is <br /> assured that the intent of the land use plan fits in very neatly with <br /> the development regulations. <br /> u. ARTICLE 2 - ADMINISTRATIVE MECHANISMS - PLANNING BOARD TENUR'y <br /> Planner Susan Smith referred to agenda item 5u - Article 2 - <br /> Administrative Mechanisms for the Planning Board Tenure and indicated <br /> this amendments would clarify that new members appointed to fi'_1 <br /> unexpired terms will be eligible for two additional full terms and to <br /> specify that one-third of the Board membership will expire in February <br /> of. each year. <br /> Chair Willhoit asked that "calendar year" be changed to read twelve <br /> (12) months. <br /> o. ARTICLE 5 - DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS RECREATION SPACE RATIO <br /> 6. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS (A copy of the complete <br /> narrative is in the permanent agenda file in the Clerk's office) . <br /> a. SECTION IV-B-7 SITES FOR PUBLIC USE - RECREATION/SCHOOL SITES <br /> b. SECTION V - IMPROVEMENTS - HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION <br />