Agenda - 03-25-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

EXCERPT FROM February 18 , 1986 BOCC MINUTES 3 engineering fees for Priority I roofs at Stanback Jr. Hi h 2 and A.L. Stanback Schools. g 3 4 4. REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF SKETCH THOROUGHFARE PLAN BY 5 NCDOT • Request NCDOT to initiate the development of a sketch 7 thoroughfare plan for Orange County. Motion was made by 8 that the forgoing action be taken by the Board. 9 VOTE: UNANIMOUS. • 10 • 11 H. ITEMS FOR DECISION-OTHER 12 1. Z-1-86 DONNIE CHAPMAN REZONING REQUEST 13 Director of Planning Marvin Collins presented for consideration 14 of approval the rezoning request submitted by Donnie Chapman to correct an 15 error in the Zoning Atlas. On October 1, 1984 when . zoning became 16 effective in Cheeks Township, the property of Donnie H. Chapman was placed 17 in an EC-5 Existing Commercial zoning category. The land placed in that 18 designation was thought to include those buildings associated with Mr. 19 Chapman's automotive service. The buildings located on an adjacent tract 20 (in the same ownership) are presently zoned AR. The intent of the 21 rezoning is to match the building locations with the appropriate zoning 22 classification. The Planning Board recommended approval of the rezoning 23 request to correct an error in the Zoning Atlas. 24 Motion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner 25 Walker, to approve the recommendation of the Planning Board. 2 C VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 27 ' 2. PD-5-85 SCOTSWOOD 28 Director of Planning Marvin Collins presented for consideration 29 of approval a proposed planned development and rezoning request submitted 30 by John W. Graham and A. H. Graham, Jr. This item was submitted to public 31 hearing on November 25, 1985 and January 6, 1986. The Grahams have 32 requested rezoning for 331. 12 acres of land located along Highway 70 33 Bypass and St. Mary's Road northeast of Hillsborough. The property is 34 currently designated as Ten Year Transition and Commercial Transition 35 Activity Node in the Orange County Land Use Plan. The present zoning is R- 36 1. The applicants are requesting 290. 03 acres to be rezoned PD-H-R2, 37 29.50 acres to be rezoned PD-H-R5 and 10.43 acres to be rezoned PD-GC4. 38 Commissioner Lloyd referred to two documents in the agenda packet 39 and questioned the validity of receiving additional information after 40 the public hearing was held. 41 Attorney Gledhill maintained that the documents present arguments 42 and do not contain any new evidence that is not already in the Planning 43 Board minutes. The public hearing was continued to receive the Planning 44 Board recommendation. He pointed out the importance of making a decision 45 on the evidence submitted at the public hearing. 46 Chair Wilihoit pointed out the public hearing was held open to 47 receive the Planning Board recommendation which would include the process 48 they followed in reaching the final decision. The arguments that are put 49 forth during the Planning Board meeting are important as part of that 50 decision process. During deliberations on any item, the planning staff 5 1 . provides to the Planning Board their technical expertise to assist them in 52'5` making a decision. This information may or may not have been brought out 53 at the public hearing and would be considered as professional consensus 54 type information. 55 56