Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 011 <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> Meeting Date MARCH_4_1 .81 <br /> Action & enda <br /> Item RE <br /> A._ <br /> PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE N. C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION <br /> PROCEDURES FOR PAVING SECONDARY ROADS <br /> DEPARTMENT: SECONDARY ROADS ADVISORY PUBLIC HEARING ___Yes _X_ No <br /> COMMITTEE <br /> Attachment(s) Information Contact : GEORGE BRESSLER, <br /> ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION CHAIR <br /> SUMMARY/FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY FUNDS <br /> 1985-1986 <br /> Telephone Numbers <br /> Hillsborough - 732-8181 <br /> Durham -- 688-7331 <br /> Mebane - 227-2031 <br /> 44� Chapel Hill - 968-4501 <br /> PURPOSE: To consider proposed changes in the N. C.Transportation Procedures for Paving Secondary Roads as <br /> recommended by the Secondary Road Improvements Advisory <br /> Committee. <br /> NEED: In May of 1984 the Secondary Road Improvements Advisory <br /> Committee was created and given the following directives : <br /> (1 ) To review the priority rating of County roads , including <br /> the methods used in the rating system and the survey <br /> results used to assign ratings . <br /> (2) To review the annual Secondary Road Improvements Program as <br /> proposed by NCDOT. <br /> (3) To make recommendations to the Board of Commissioners <br /> regarding changes to the rating system and/or the Secondary <br /> Road Improvements Program, and to identify discrepancies in <br /> the assigned ratings of County roads . <br /> The Committee has reviewed the rating methods , the assigned <br /> priority ratings for state-maintained roads in Orange County <br /> and the methods of funds distribution, and prepared the <br /> attached recommendations . <br /> IMPACT: If the Board of Commissioners decides to recommend <br /> to the Participatory Paving Program, the Board angof <br /> Transportation can consider the proposals for implementation. <br /> The changes would not only result in additional funds for <br /> paving roads on the priority list , but would also increase <br /> costs for participation in the Participatory Paving Program. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: As the Board decides. <br /> • <br />