Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-24-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 02-24-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 11:37:44 AM
Creation date
9/20/2016 10:50:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/1986
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION; 2-4-86 (Rezoning Request) Vernon P. Davis <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE 15 EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" indicates compliance; "No" Indicates Noncompliance <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance Requirements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> wi th ai I requi cements speci- <br /> fled in .Article 20 - Amend- <br /> ments. Those requirements <br /> include: <br /> 20. 32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less 1"=100' <br /> than 1 '= 100" nor more than 1 '= <br /> 20' <br /> 20. 3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> property <br /> 20. 3.2 c) Explanation of alleged X Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, i f any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20. 3.2 d) Changed conditions , if X Yes No No changed conditions alleged Yes No <br /> any , which make amendment reasona- <br /> bly necessary to promote public <br /> health , safety and general welfare. <br /> 20. 3.2 e) Manner in which proposed Yes No Property is located in a rural Yes No <br /> amendment will carry out purpose community '_�D <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive C <br /> Plan, 00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.