Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-24-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 02-24-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2016 11:37:44 AM
Creation date
9/20/2016 10:50:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/24/1986
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
186
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> PERTAINING TO <br /> APPLICATION: HOMESTEAD HIGHLANDS <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDS THAT THERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING <br /> ARTICLE 20 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/REZONING ("Yes" Indicates compliance; "No" indicates Noncompliance <br /> PLANNING STAFF PLANNING <br /> FINDINGS BASED ON BOARD <br /> SUBMITTED APPLICATION EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO SUPPORT FINDINGS RECOMMENDED <br /> Ordinance Reg ui rements FINDINGS <br /> The application must comply <br /> with all requirements speci- <br /> Cied in Article 20 - Amend- <br /> inents. Those requirements <br /> include: <br /> 20. 32 a) Map showing affected X Yes No Site Plan provided at scale of Yes No <br /> property at scale of not less 1"=100' <br /> than I1= 100" nor more than 1 '= <br /> 20. 3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No Description provided with application Yes No <br /> property <br /> 20. 3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No No error alleged Yes No <br /> error, i f any, to be corrected by <br /> proposed amendment <br /> 20. 3.2 d) Changed conditions , if X Yes No Applicant cites rapid growth in Yes No <br /> any , which make amendment reasona- Chapel Hill/Carrboro area and shortage <br /> b i y necessary to promote public of single—family residential development <br /> fecal th , safety and general welfare. sites. <br /> Q <br /> 2003.2 e) Manner in which proposed Yes No Applicant notes property is located Yes Nci=, <br /> owcndment wi11 carry out purpose within an area designated ten and Ui <br /> and intent of adopted Comprehensive Twenty Year Transition Area on the adopted plan � <br /> Flan. and designated for suburban residential developnent at- <br /> 2 5 units per acre on the proposed JPA plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.