Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-18-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 02-18-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 11:26:00 AM
Creation date
9/20/2016 10:34:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/18/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 Page 17 <br /> combination resulting in 25% would satisfy the <br /> condition. <br /> Pilkey inquires if commercial uses were included. <br /> Smith responded no as these were not typically high <br /> water users . <br /> Shanklin inquired why there was no "escape clause" <br /> if the water crises is solved. Smith responded the <br /> condition also addresses the impacts of the total <br /> project over time. Kramer noted a water policy is <br /> needed to guide the decisions of the Board. <br /> Walters questioned why the project is bound to <br /> conditions others are not tied to. Kramer expressed <br /> concern with the tinkering with unresolved issues. <br /> Smith reviewed the staff options provided for <br /> conditions #41 . Collins commented on annexation <br /> requirements and the general rule of thumb that <br /> projects be 60% built-out . The Board discussed <br /> phase related conditions . <br /> MOTION: Kramer moved approval of option a) . Shanklin <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> The Board discussed condition #43. Collins <br /> recommended its deletion as the property to be <br /> served has other access. <br /> VOTE: 7 in favor <br /> 1 opposed -- Best <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of the addition of a <br /> condition requiring consultation with the <br /> Hillsborough Postmaster for the provision of mail <br /> service. Kramer seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> Kramer expressed opposition to the project on the <br /> basis of a lack of clarity with the water issue and <br /> traffic problems . He felt he could not act on the <br /> proposal in any form in the absence of a water <br /> policy. <br /> MOTION: , Kramer moved that the Board ask the County <br /> Commissioners to develop a water policy prior to <br /> consideration of approval of Scotswood or any other <br /> pending projects that require water and sewer from <br /> Hillsborough. Margison seconded the motion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.