Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
131 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 <br /> Page 16 <br /> Margison expressed a desire for shaded areas in the <br /> tot lots . <br /> The Board amended h) to read "where appropriate" <br /> and by concensus added that "shaded areas are to be <br /> provided within the tot lot area". <br /> There was no discussion of condition #30. <br /> The Board discussed condition #31 . <br /> Pilkey suggested the hiring of a forester . <br /> Margison inquired about internal tree retention. <br /> Smith noted if this was imposed on the single- <br /> family area it would raise the question of the <br /> desirability of regulation beyond the imposed <br /> buffer requirements . <br /> Jacobs noted that Commissioner Marshall had <br /> requested specific criteria for protecting existing <br /> vegetation. <br /> Smith suggested in response to the concern that the <br /> condition be amended to control construction of <br /> improvements to limit clearing. <br /> MOTION: Pilkey moved approval of condition #31 to limit <br /> clearing on the single family area to the <br /> installation/construction of improvements . Kramer <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE:N: <br /> in favor <br /> 3 opposed - Shanklin, Walters , Yuhasz <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved the extension of the meeting to <br /> conclude this item. Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> There was no discussion of conditions 32-38. <br /> Yuhasz expressed concern about the responsibility <br /> of individual homeowners and the continued validity <br /> of the Special Use Permit if violation occur . <br /> Smith noted that condition #39 has been amended by <br /> staff to add specificity regarding the storm event <br /> standard. <br /> The Board discussed condition #40. <br /> Jacobs inquired how the different housing types <br /> were accounted for. Collins responded any <br />