Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
131 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 Page 15 <br /> solely responsible as the first developer but <br /> should only share part of the burden. <br /> VOTE: 4 in favor - .".".argison, Pilkey, Jacobs , Best <br /> 4 opposed - Yuhasz , Shanklin, Kramer, Walters . <br /> The Board noted that the issues here were the <br /> length of improvements and the timing of <br /> construction of the turn lane. <br /> Smith informed the Board that NCDOT had verified it <br /> wanted no involvement by a developer in the <br /> installation or financing of traffic lights . Best <br /> concurred with the staff on NCDOT' s position. <br /> MOTION: Best moved deletion of condition #20. Kramer <br /> seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved extension of the meeting for twenty <br /> minutes . Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> Shanklin inquired if #22 should refer to both <br /> Carolina Avenue and Second Street . <br /> The Board directed that the references be <br /> corrected. <br /> The Board discussed condition #23 . Jacobs asked <br /> about Town standards . Smith responded there are <br /> none. <br /> Pilkey asked what size was implied on Condition <br /> #24. Smith responded there was no information from <br /> the Town. <br /> Yuhasz questioned how far along St . Mary' s was <br /> intended by condition #24. <br /> There was no discussion of conditions #25 - 28. <br /> The Board discussed #29. <br /> Jacobs questioned (h) noting "wherever possible" <br /> should read "wherever appropriate" . <br /> Walters expressed concern with the convenience of <br /> access for bikes and dirt bikes to these recreation <br /> areas. Collins suggested entrance obstruction. <br /> Yuhasz noted wheelchair access is required. <br />