Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
l2t <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 <br /> Page 10 <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 6.12 f)-h) . <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Kramer moved a positive finding on 5. 1 . 2 a-e) . <br /> Shanklin seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 6. 12 a-d) . <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a <br /> positive finding on 7. 15. 6-9. <br /> Walters Seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 7.15. 10a) 1-3. <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION: Consideration of items seperately. <br /> VOTE ( 7. 5.10 a) 1'I and a) - 3) : Unanimous <br /> VOTE ( 7.15. 10 a)2: 3 in favor - Walters , Yuhasz, Shanklin <br /> 5 opposed. <br /> Motion failed. <br /> Best expressed concern about the creation of <br /> hazardous situations . Margison and Kramer concurred <br /> with Best . Pilkey added it does not encourage <br /> smooth traffic flow. <br /> Collins asked the Board to speak specifically to <br /> the design. <br /> Kramer felt the added lanes may not be sufficient <br /> for St . Mary's Road. Shanklin noted that traffic <br /> on St . Mary' s was not related to the commercial <br /> area. Kramer withdrew his comment . <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 7. 15.10 a) 3 <br /> and d and 7.15. 10b) . Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous. <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved approval of 6.24 f)1-3. Kramer <br /> seconded the motion. <br />