Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 <br /> Page 9 <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 7. 14.3 a) 1-5. <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE ( 7.14 3a) 1) ! 7 in favor <br /> 2 opposed - Kramer, Pilkey <br /> VOTE ( 7.14 3a) 2-5) : Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on and b) 1-3. Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> a) 6-7 <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a <br /> positive finding on 7. 14.3 b) 4-5 . <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> Margison asked if sidewalks were required on the <br /> main street . Shanklin cited statements by Don Cox <br /> requesting no sidewalks for drainage purposes. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a <br /> positive finding on 5. 1 .1. <br /> Walters seconded the motion. <br /> Margison indicated she was opposed as the project <br /> is uneconomical . . <br /> Smith cautioned the Board that specific findings <br /> must be based on evidence presented and not on <br /> one's personal concerns . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous . <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive findings on 6 . 12 a-d) . <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Yuhasz moved a positive finding on 6. 12 f) - h) . <br /> Shanklin seconded the motion. Kramer asked if a <br /> distinction is made in the standards between <br /> passive and active recreation. Smith responded no. <br /> Pilkey asked how separation requirements are <br /> determined. Smith cited the formula in the <br /> ordinance . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a <br /> positive finding on 5.1. 1 a-e) . <br /> Pilkey seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br />