Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 2-4-86 Page 8 <br /> Margison felt the project does not enhance the <br /> town. <br /> Walters expressed concern that the written comment <br /> of Jacobs and Best were their opinions , not the <br /> consensus of the Board. <br /> Pilkey expressed concern with the commercial <br /> aspects and the lack of separation between <br /> commercial areas. <br /> Jacobs cited his written statement . <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 4.2 a-c) . <br /> Yuhasz seconded the motion. <br /> Best inquired if d) concerned water. <br /> Smith said b) was the specific provision. <br /> Best expressed concern with the statement of the <br /> Sheriff. Shanklin felt the Sheriff did not say he <br /> "had to have" the vehicles and personnel . <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 4.2. 11 a-c) . <br /> Walters seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: Unanimous <br /> MOTION: Shanklin moved a positive finding on 7.4.1-3. <br /> Walters seconded the motion. <br /> Pilkey questioned 7. 4.3. Smith noted the <br /> statements at public hearing referred to timing of <br /> installation of stormwater devices, not the devices <br /> themselves. <br /> Pilkey asked the classification of Miller Road. <br /> Smith responded it is a collector road. <br /> AMENDMENT TO THE MOT Consideration of each item separately. <br /> VOTE ( 7.4. 1) : 6 in favor <br /> 2 opposed - Pilkey, Margison <br /> VOTE ( 7.4. 2) : 3 in favor - Shanklin, Walters , Yuhasz <br /> 5 opposed <br /> Motion fails <br /> VOTE ( 7.4. 3) : 7 in favor <br /> 1 opposed - Best <br />