Agenda - 02-18-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

13 _r Commissioner Carey asked about the four exits onto St. Mary's Road and McAdams indicaated they are proposed 600-800 feet apart. Peter Kramer asked if the traffic from Trayhorn down St. Mary's Road had been taken into account because those people use St. Mary's Road and McAdams indicate° the impact of that traffic had been considered to some extent but that the traffic going . up St. Mary's Road to Hillsborough had not been-'considered because most of those people are employed in Durham. Peter Kramer asked that the traffic from Trayhorn down St. Mary's Road also be reviewed. Barry Jacobs asked on what criteria was based the assessment that - most of the traffic on St. Mary's Road would come to Hillsborough rather than away and Heiser indicated it was based on the attraction of Hillsborough and Chape. Bill and on the number of alternate routes available to the Chapel Hill and Carrboro area rather than through Hillsborough. Barry Jacobs questioned the distance from'Lawrence Road to Scotswood which was not answered. McAdams also did not know the difference between the plan as submitted in the 1970's and the plan as submitted for Scotswood at this time. He indicated, in response to a question from Chair Willhoit, that the project would be phased in within a ten year period. • Commissioner Marshall requested that the beginning and completion dates be placed on the plan for all future projects to come before the Board. Chair Willhoit asked about the situation on the water pressure and McAcirrns indicated their study shows that water pressure would be adequate for the project including the improvements that will be made and included as part of the project. Chair Willhoit asked if there was any proposal to provide additional classrooms for the schools and McAdams indicated there was no. proposal for such: He noted the approximate value per house would be,r75,000. Chair Willhoit pointed out that at the current I18 per pupil, it would take a x130,000 house just to break even. McAdams assured that the impervious surface ratio would be provided. He pointed out that the design of the development included a 200 foot buffer zone on both sides of Yanceyville Creek and special efforts were made to minimize the traffic impact on adjoining properties. He made comments on the proposed conditions of approval: (1) With reference to f7 that the 41 ' paved cross section be reduced to 37' .