Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
055 <br /> DRAFT PB MINUTES 1-27-86 <br /> 10 <br /> The property in question is located on SR 1144 (West <br /> Ten Road) in Cheeks Township.. The property is <br /> referenced as part of Lot 38 of Tax Map 21 , Block B. <br /> It is bordered by agricultural and residential <br /> development . The tract is designated as Twenty Year <br /> Transition on the Land Use Plan . <br /> There are six (6) lots proposed out of 7 .74 acres . <br /> The Lot sizes are 3 lots at .92 acre, .93 acre , 1 . 07 <br /> acres , and 1 .70 acres , excluding the rights of--way . <br /> The property is zoned R-1 (Rural Residential ) . <br /> Access is provided to the site via an Orange County <br /> (Amy Jo Lane) Private Class "B" road which leads to <br /> SR 1144. Fire protection for the <br /> question is provided by the property in <br /> bistrict . Law enforcement e Ffland Rural Fire <br /> st G rcement is provided by the Orange <br /> County heriff s Department . It will be patrolled on <br /> a 24—hour basis . <br /> Development of this subdivision would have minima <br /> impact on the area . L <br /> The projected traffic generation for this subdivision <br /> is approximately 40. 2 (6 .7 trips x 6 lots) trips per <br /> day . According to the Department of Transportation , <br /> the 1984 (most current) traffic count is 100 for SR <br /> 1144 which was determined from the west side of SR <br /> 1143 , <br /> The Planning Staff recommends approval of this <br /> subdivision contingent upon the following conditions : <br /> 1 ) name of the owner(S) be indicated on the p tat, <br /> 2) toteL acreage of the tract be indicated on the <br /> plat . <br /> Collins noted that the access easement was an attempt <br /> to provide access to the Lots which front on I-86. <br /> Discussion followed regarding future subdivision <br /> activity and upgrading of the road by Later <br /> developers . Smith noted that this requirement , <br /> could be imposed upon future developers , the issue <br /> being the cost of obtaining easement . <br /> Best inquired if there was sufficient right—of—way to Smith wupgrade the o • s <br /> asfiiftyfeetasrequired byNC0OTtl the right—of—way <br /> P10TZGtJ Kizer moved approve subject to staff conditions , <br /> Seconded by Best , <br />