Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-06-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 01-06-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 9:33:56 AM
Creation date
9/19/2016 3:27:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/6/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ise <br /> DRAFT. P^;1 Fix;11 TES 12-19—CF, PAGE 1F.; <br /> 17 . A unit numbering systee and corresponding unit <br /> Location shell be filed with the Ptannin <br /> Department prior to the iesuance of eni building <br /> ing <br /> permit . This sycten shalt be user; in obtaining and <br /> issuing any building permit . Any change in the <br /> unit nembering syzeem must be filed with the Orange <br /> County Planning Department . <br /> 16 . A final boundary survey of the Planr.ed Development- <br /> and improvements shall be recorded by the <br /> developer . - . <br /> 12 . The final site plan and narrative of the project <br /> incorporating all changes , deletions and additions <br /> through the final approval oT the project are <br /> incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned <br /> Development Special Use Permit . A copy of the <br /> final site plan and narrative are on file . with the <br /> Orange County Planning Department . Grading and <br /> building permits , upon application , will be issued <br /> after approval and recordation of the Special Use <br /> Permit . <br /> 20 . The development shall be built and operated • <br /> according to the site plan and written narrative <br /> supplied by the developer and in compliance with <br /> the above conditions . <br /> Smith noted positive findings on all findings of <br /> fact . <br /> Walters inquired who is the owner of the pump area . <br /> Smith responded the applicant . <br /> Kizer inquired if there was any objection to any of <br /> the conditions by the applicant . Smith responded <br /> no . Smith continued noting that there were no <br /> comments in opposition to the request or comments <br /> by the applicant at the public hearing . <br /> Shanklin inquired if the applicant had agreed to <br /> Condition #9 (2 parking spaces per unit) . Smith <br /> responded yes . Shanklin continued in reference to <br /> condition #14, if "shalt be maintained" should be <br /> changed to read "may be maintained" . Jacobs noted <br /> that he felt it should read "shall be maintained or <br /> enhanced" . He felt it should be kept strong . <br /> t'UT1fl! : Shanklin moved positive findings on the entire <br /> package . Ceconded by Pearson . <br /> Kizer questioned the single access • point . Smith <br /> . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.