Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-06-1986
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Agenda - 01-06-1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 9:33:56 AM
Creation date
9/19/2016 3:27:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/6/1986
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ART CLE 7 - SPEC IF I C STANDARDS FOR EVALUAT I 01NI/i'LANNCD DEVF LOPNIENTS {Con t i hued} <br /> PLANNING BOARD Rnr.r. <br /> Ordinance Requirements Findinge Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Findings <br /> Article 7. 14. 3 Sets forth "site <br /> planning" �,L,iodards with which <br /> an applicant rust comply. <br /> Standards regarding "external <br /> ri; ationsitips" are- as fol-3ows; - -- - --- - <br /> - - <br /> a) 1 . Access points provided to Yes NO All traffic will obtain access to the site Yes No <br /> ciicourage smooth traffic via White Cross Road (SR 1950 . Applicant — — <br /> flow with controlled turn- proposes to use the existing entrance to the site. <br /> ing frovornents and minimun' No minor streets are affected by the proposed development. <br /> haz;,rd to vch i cul ar or <br /> pedestrian traffic. Use of <br /> minor streets by substan- <br /> tial traffic is discouraged. <br /> a)2 , Safe and convenient routes Yes No Applicant has indicated safe pedestrian _V,os No <br /> provided for pc dl strians routes 'through the development. <br /> and motorcyclists. Crossings <br /> safely marked, located and <br /> cons rol lud. <br /> a}3 . Visibility provided at inter- X Yes No Visibility looking south from the entrance Yes No <br /> sections (pudestrian and vehicular) is adequate. Visibility looking north is — <br /> in accordance with Article 6.5, 425 feet and could be improved .significantly if brush on the back- <br /> slope to the north of the entrance was cut back and maintained, <br /> a) i. 100-foot open space provided Yeas Na Y�}s No <br /> along perirs�eter of PD-H district. —)F- "—' Adjacent property is similarly zoned and may----- — <br /> Recreational use and off-street be developed at the same densityin accordance with setback <br /> parking set back at least 75 feet requirements; 100' open space is) therefore, not required. <br /> of district boundary. <br /> a)5. Yards, fences, walks or X Yes No Applicant proposed to retain as much existing <br /> vcguLatiun aruvided to screen ' natural vegetation as possible. individual _Yes _N° <br /> Uff undcsirabic views, light- parking spaces and refuse collection are proposed <br /> ing, noise, etc. Parking/ with no specific screening required or provided. <br /> loading areas and refuse collec- <br /> tion/storage areas screened. <br /> CA <br /> Aw► <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.