Agenda - 01-06-1986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

P! AFT -PIM MINJUTES 12-16-05 PAGE 0 DeveLcproer t ci' this subdivision eculd hove minimal ir.apecs or the area . The PlannirL Board recommends approval of the Preliminary Plan Contineent upon the following ccnlitians : (1 ) F. roe de a note. on the plat which states that access for Lot #3 is to be restricted to Tallyho Trail ( 2) •subr;i scion• of a storrrwater -w.anagement plan to satisfy the standard requiring infiltration of the first 1/2 inch of runoff .(3) approval of Lots #2 and • B for on-site • • wastewater system or combination of the Lots to. provide approved sites for each lot proposed or notation on plat indicating the unsuitability of the lots for development (NOTE: APPLICANT 'S APPEAL OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT DECISION) Discussion followed on the policy regarding septic systems . Jacobs recommended delay until the appeal of the Health Department decision had been resolved . Smith reminded the Board of the 70 day review period . Kizer noted this could be handled with a restricted use notation or the plat . NOTION : Jacobs moved to defer consideration until the appeal was resolved or the 70 day period had been reached . Yuhasz noted that the ordinance allows for. recordation of plats if lots do not perk . With no second , the motion was withdrawn . MOTION : Kizer moved approval with Staff conditions 1 and 2 and a revision of the third condition to add that the plat be marked to show that Lots 2 and 3 do not pass Health Department approval .. Walters seconded . Discussion followed regarcing the notation in regard to the outcome of the appeal . Smith noted i the applicant won the appeal he could come bac with the plat without the notation . Kize responded that if the oppLicart could come back with the Final is Lat and show that they have been inspected and pissed or have redivided the Lots , then this would :satisfy shat the Planning Board wa- looking for . Best asked if the lots veer: recceinF1' eculd the appLiceent have to come bec • I -