Orange County NC Website
SOS: 1970 U.S. Census. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the <br /> Census. <br /> it AGE. The distribution of the population by age in Orange County reflects <br /> " : the attraction of this area to; young adults seeking and finding employment <br /> •y and higher education opportunities. The median age of the population <br /> during the 1.960-1970 period was the 20-24 age group. The County is likely <br /> to experience slow maturational the area population due to the continued <br /> inn-migration of individua 1 s in this age group,during the plan period. <br /> TABLE 2-56 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY POPULATION BY AGE <br /> AGE GROUP 1960 DIFFEFENCE i- ar -T" <br /> 1970 1960-1970 <br /> 0-4 4,933 4,357 - 576 <br /> 5-914 3,993 4,459 + 466 <br /> 3,552 4,429 + 877 <br /> '` <br /> 20-24 6,0115 7,141 + 2,566 <br /> ,5 5 + 5,494 <br /> 25-29 <br /> 3,602 5,387 + 1,785 <br /> 30--34 2,809 3,252 + 443 <br /> 35-39 2,584 2,692 + 108 <br /> 40-44 2,194 2,593 + 399 <br /> 45-49 1,885 2,558 + 673 <br /> 50-54 1,676 2,160 + 484 <br /> 55-59 1,400 1,832 + 432 <br /> 60-64 1,116 1,552 + 436 <br /> 65-69 1,055 1,331 + 276 <br /> ;. 70-74 <br /> 75-79 469 1,034 <br /> 707 + 317 <br /> $5+and over 148 422 + 171 <br /> 296 + 148 <br /> TOTAL 42,970 57,707 +14,737 <br /> SOURCE: 1960, 1970 U.S. Census. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of <br /> the Census. Orange County Survey Report 1977-78, Division of <br /> School Planning. N.C. Department of Public Instruction. <br /> Distribution and Patterns of Settlement <br /> The distribution of population throughout Change County and the resultant <br /> settlement pattern reflect the dominant influence of the Towns of Chapel. <br /> Hill and Carrboro and a trend toward rural in-migration as apposed to the <br /> historical pattern of out--migration (Figure 2-57 ). The typical rural <br /> settlement pattern is changing as significant new non-farm development <br /> replaces a decreasing farm population at an increasing rate of farmland <br /> conversion. Large lot subdivisions, within easy commuting distance of <br /> employment centers, and suburban expansion around the incorporated areas <br /> reflects this pattern of decentralization. <br />