Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-02-1981
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1981
>
Agenda - 02-02-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2016 9:49:18 AM
Creation date
9/19/2016 9:46:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/2/1981
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' ;1..,:l':' '' '''''• .... . . <br /> ' . . <br /> ,',, ,i2 :,„,,,,, .: • .. <br /> - ..„ . <br /> . . <br /> /5 <br /> . ....,, <br /> ... .: ) i. 4 :. <br /> , ,, • -4.,,.. , , ....■ ' * . '0 <br /> .. . <br /> .. , u. <br /> . ., . <br /> • 1111 . <br /> ,,..,.,..,THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY INC. <br /> i . . <br /> • CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> • , , 100 HAYES BUILDING,GLEN LENNOX CENTER,CHAPEL HILL <br /> i . <br /> P.O BOX 2896,CHAPEL HILL,NORTH CAROLINA 27514 (919)967 T079 <br /> , _.... <br /> ORANGE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA <br /> . i <br /> INTERIM REPORT ON <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY ON SOLUTION TO SANITARY SEWER PROBLEM <br /> ' '• EFLAND ESTATES SUBDIVISION <br /> . OCO 8002 <br /> . . This interim report provides only the results of the investigation and <br /> • <br /> 1 analysis of the Efland Estates sewer problem. The purpose of this report is <br /> . <br /> to provide guidance in a decision to apply for grants to fund the construction <br /> of a solution to the problem. <br /> . , <br /> .. ',"... I. REGIONAL vs LOCAL SOLUTION <br /> it is this firm's opinion that the problem should be addressed only as <br /> it applies to Efland Estates Subdivision, and not to the greater Efland <br /> area. The factors behind this opinion are <br /> . . , A. There are no other identified septic tank failures in the greater <br /> area, and no impending failures are known. <br /> . . <br /> — <br /> B. The greater area is in a water supply watershed, and stimulation <br /> . . <br /> of development is undesirable. <br /> C. Regional solution becomes extremely expensive (into the millions). <br /> D. The normal means of funding regional. sewerage works is through EPA; <br /> but EPA funds could not be available until October, 1982. <br /> E. Qualifications for other sources of funding are better if the <br /> project focuses specifically on the existing health threat in <br /> Efland Estates. <br /> II. WASTEWATER FACILITIES <br /> • A. On-Site Collection System <br /> 1. 8" gravity collection system $136,400 <br /> . . <br /> 2. Pressure collection system with pump at each <br /> . .•"::'''.:::".;.:.,.. •-• '-'-: house $149,700 <br /> ---\ <br /> . . . <br /> . . - . <br /> . • . <br /> ' . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.