Browse
Search
Agenda - 03-13-2007-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2007
>
Agenda - 03-13-2007
>
Agenda - 03-13-2007-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:40:07 PM
Creation date
8/28/2008 11:24:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/13/2007
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20070313
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
40 <br />• OPC does not maintain schedules for IPRS or Medicaid service providers. <br />Three way calls are used to schedule assessment appointments for all <br />consumers. <br />The lack of schedules maintained in Pro-FilerT"'' means that a STAR clinician must <br />call the .provider and schedule the appointment over the phone. This business rule <br />limits the actual hours we can make referrals for consumers to providers to the <br />operating hours of the providers. We have created a strategic objective to address <br />this issue. <br />• Indigent consumers needing a routine mental health or substance abuse <br />assessment (other than Driving While under the Influence) are referred to <br />the same provider in Orange, Person and:.Ctiatham counties. <br />=s;~ <br />/ `~~ <br />OPC currently refers new consumers requiring an assessment for. a mental health <br />condition to one provider in Oranges Person and Chatham counties. During <br />divestiture, OPC released an RFP for comprehersive service agencies to deliver the <br />services previously delivered by OPC to indigenf consumers and incorporate the <br />then "new" service definitions. After a thorough review process only one provider <br />was chosen as a Comprehensive Service Agency. This, decision created one "safety <br />net" organization to receive the IPRS funds for assessmenfi'ard treatment of indigent <br />consumers. At the time this decision focused on system iatability during the transition <br />year. Over the past eight months, the capacity of this provider to perform the <br />assessments within~''the; timelines, especially for urgent or emergent consumers, <br />varies a great deal across the region. OPG acknowledges that inadequate IPRS <br />funds limits flexibility; howeue~, we feel choice of providers for indigent consumers is <br />too limited. A strategic objective .is listed to address the issue. <br />,; ~ - - <br />~._<. __. <br />• OPC :uses a.._ paper system to receive and distribute authorization <br />requests/approvals, STR forms and Person Centered Plans. <br />-- <br />OPGs~goal is to have,a'paper~ess~or virtually paperless system. Presently, providers <br />of IPRS:,services submit a paper authorization form, which we enter into Pro-FilerT"' <br />Authorization .,,requests: are printed and faxed to .providers. A process which allows <br />providers to~,receive and submit forms electronically would reduce cost, and save <br />time for both``providers and the LME. Full implementation of electronic capacity <br />would correct this issue. <br />~~' <br />• In order to provide services to a greater number of consumers, OPC has <br />chosen to limit its IPRS Benefit Plan. <br />Insufficient IPRS funds result in limited authorizations that are not always sufficient <br />to meet the needs of the consumers. As system reform has progressed and our <br />system has transitioned, many consumers were already engaged in traditional <br />treatments and therapy. It takes time to transition people out of services while <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.