Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-20-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2016
>
Agenda - 09-20-2016 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 09-20-2016 - 6-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2016 10:30:32 AM
Creation date
9/16/2016 10:29:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/20/2016
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes 09-20-2016
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Refined Housing Type Categories <br /> 3 • Disaggregated data down to number of bedrooms per unit (SFD, SFA, MF) <br /> 4 • Calculations for smaller-sized single-family detached (<800 square feet) <br /> 5 • Age-Restricted Units <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Illustration of Fees - CHCSS <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Illustration of Fees - OCS <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Proposed Steps to Update School Impact Fee Levels <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Recommendation for Tonight <br /> 14 • Receive the draft studies. <br /> 15 • Hear the presentation by the consultant and Planning staff. <br /> 16 • Discuss the topic as desired. <br /> 17 • Direct staff to proceed with the outlined schedule and Ordinance updates. <br /> 18 • Set a public hearing for the October 4, 2016 BOCC meeting. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Commissioner Jacobs asked if this applies solely to new construction. <br /> 21 Perdita Holtz said yes. <br /> 22 Commissioner Jacobs said there was an issue years ago, where someone purchased a <br /> 23 unit, paid an impact fee, moved the house to a new lot, and was charged another impact fee. <br /> 24 Malcolm Munkittrick said in his opinion another impact fee should not be paid. <br /> 25 John Roberts said he presented this to the Board in 2012, and the BOCC did not <br /> 26 approve the amendment. He said the reason behind the additional impact fee is that, if <br /> 27 development on the prior property is not restricted in any way, then it has an impact as a new <br /> 28 building could be constructed on that property. He said to avoid a second impact fee there <br /> 29 would need to be an easement or some development restriction placed on the prior location of <br /> 30 the moved structure. He said the BOCC did not approve the amendment and made no other <br /> 31 change. <br /> 32 Commissioner Jacobs said he was one Board member that did not like the attorney's <br /> 33 previous opinion. <br /> 34 Perdita Holtz said North Carolina does not have specific impact fee legislation, but <br /> 35 rather enabling legislation that was drafted for Orange and Chatham counties. She said this is <br /> 36 based in land use laws, and the practices follow the law the land use ordinance. <br /> 37 John Roberts said the Orange County Impact Fee ordinance was authorized under the <br /> 38 County's land use authority, which is why a public hearing is required to amend the ordinance. <br /> 39 He said the fee likely should be tied to the parcel of land, but this has not been tested in the <br /> 40 courts. <br /> 41 Commissioner Dorosin asked if the recommendation is for a more disaggregated fee <br /> 42 than currently exists. He asked if it should be disaggregated by bedroom size, and overall size, <br /> 43 with 800 feet being the cut off. <br /> 44 Perdita Holtz said yes, and if 800 feet were not the cut off then more research would <br /> 45 need to be done. <br /> 46 Commissioner Dorosin said this recommendation would not be disaggregating for <br /> 47 Orange County Schools. <br /> 48 Perdita Holtz said yes, just for the single-family detached house. <br /> 49 Commissioner Dorosin clarified that this is due to the anomaly where the four bedroom <br /> 50 home is cheaper that the three bedroom. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.