Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:57:15 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • 0 0 0 0 1 1 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • is not. The! Town has recommended inclusion of this project in <br /> NCDOT's 1985 TIP as a first priority project, but NCDOT has yet to <br /> decide whether to adopt the Town's recommendation. Until <br /> improvement Of U.S. 15-501 between the By-Pass and the Chatham <br /> County line is at least scheduled for construction in the near <br /> future, we believe that rezoning this site to .allow urban <br /> intensities is premature. <br /> _ • <br /> We recommend tht. the Chapel Hill TOwn Council and the Orange County Board <br /> of Commissioners deny this application for rezoning as premature <br /> and recommend.! . that a planned development request would be more <br /> suitable for he site, given its size, location, and available <br /> services. <br /> _ . <br /> The recommendation of the Chapel Hill Planning Board follows: <br /> . A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF A REZONING APPLICATION IN THE <br /> JOINT PLANNING AREA (.85-R- ) <br /> BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill, that it . <br /> hereby recommends that the Orange County Board of Commissioners <br /> deny the application for a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone <br /> appproximately, 80 acres of the Partin property, identified as <br /> Chapel Hill Township Tax Map 128, Block B, part of Lot 20, from <br /> R-1 to R-4. This recommendation is based on the finding that • <br /> development of the site to urban intensities is premature because <br /> of <br /> a) the site's lack of water and gravity-flow sewer service <br /> necessary to serve development of the site to urban intensities; <br /> b) the inadJquacy of the existing U.S. 15-501 roadway to handle <br /> the traffic generated by development of the site to urban <br /> intensities; <br /> c) the lack of facilities necessary to ensure adequate fire <br /> • protection to an urban-type development of the site; <br /> d) the . lack of facilities necessary to ensure that the <br /> recreational needs of an urban-type development of the site are • <br /> met; <br /> • <br /> e) the unliklihood that the requisites for urban development noted <br /> above will be available to the site in the foreseeable future; <br /> and <br /> • • <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.