Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:57:15 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> IngraM inquired of Davis what %MA's policy was on extending <br /> services into jurisdictions that do not have representatives on OPENSA's Board <br /> such as Chatham eounty. <br /> Davis responded that to his knowledge there was no written policy <br /> but that services, would not be extended into Chatham County unless there was a <br /> request from local governing bodies to do so. At this time there have been no <br /> such requests and MASA does not have plans to extend service into Chatham <br /> County. <br /> Godschalk inquired of Collins and Weldon if, as professional <br /> planners, they felt that the higher density of the front (8) eight acres <br /> urbanized the 80 acres proposed for rezoning. Collins responded that the <br /> potential for urbanization was there, but not yet developed. Weldon responded <br /> no. <br /> Dick Havens, a real estate broker, representing the Partin's <br /> interest, expressed the concern that moderate housing development was not <br /> available for the public. He also noted that 14CDOT most often reacts after <br /> development rather than planning for development in improvement of roads. He <br /> expressed support for the rezoning request. He noted that growth could not be <br /> stopped but could be made more expensive. He continued that the timing <br /> allowed the developer flexibility to the market which dictates growth. <br /> Smith inquired what Havens considered moderately priced homes. <br /> Havens responded., on this property, to be $75.000 to $80,000. Smith responded <br /> that he felt this was a contradiction; that the market seemed not to be <br /> moderately priced hones. Havens noted that the longer the decision was <br /> delayed the more expensive development would be and this cost would be passed <br /> on to the consumer. <br /> By corisensus, the hearing was adjourned to the February 3, 1986 <br /> Board of Commissioners meeting for the recommendation of the Town of Chapel <br /> Hill and Orange County Planning Board. <br /> Don Willhoit, Chair <br /> Joanna Bradshaw, Admin. Secretary <br /> Beverly A. Blythe'. Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.