Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:57:15 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 3 <br /> • <br /> Willhoit inquired whether OWASA had indicated they were prepared to <br /> build the necessary sewer line at their expense. Collins responded he <br /> understood from MASA that such sewer lines would be paid for by the <br /> developer. Wilihoit asked if the developer had indicated willingness to build <br /> the needed sewer lines. <br /> Collins stated that the developer was available for questions. <br /> Willhoit referred to the findings of Article 4.2.3 (b) concerning <br /> existing water an0 sewer lines or the installation of such lines and inquired <br /> why "yes" was checked. Collins responded it was checked "yes" since MASA had <br /> indicated a willingness to serve the area and the indication that the lines <br /> could be assured provided the applicant net CWASA standards and complied with <br /> their water extension policy. Collins expressed concern that this was a major <br /> line extended a very long distance. There seemed to be problems securing the <br /> necessary easements and the extreme cost to the applicant. He also expressed <br /> concern with the potential that this major line would open up in terms of <br /> intervening development. <br /> Werner inquired if the 12-15" pipe would serve this development <br /> only or all the properties (17) that it crossed as well. Collins responded it <br /> could serve intervening properties but he did not know at this time at what <br /> density they would have to be developed. Carey inquired if it would be a <br /> gravity line or korce main. Collins responded it would be a gravity line. <br /> Preston inquired if CAS A would obtain the easements and Collins indicated the <br /> easements would be obtained by the applicant and turned over to GWASA. <br /> Pat Davis. Assistant to the Executive Director of °WAWA, noted <br /> there were two approaches for sewer service to the property. The preferable <br /> approach is to extend the gravity sewer system. He noted that CAMA does not <br /> pay for line extensions through undeveloped properties. That is the <br /> responsibility ok the benefiting party. There is a reimbursement policy that <br /> if one constructs an oversize line that will also benefit off-site property <br /> development then that party could be allowed to collect certain connection <br /> fees from futureldevelopment as it tied onto a line that they had provided.. <br /> The time period for this reimbursement plan is ten years. The second <br /> alternative wouldibe to have the developer construct a pump station and force <br /> main that could then pump the waste water from the development to an existing <br /> portion of the gravity sewer system. The developer would then be responsible <br /> for the cost of installing the pump station and the force main and also the <br /> possibility of financing a certain portion of the cost of maintenance for the <br /> pump station and force main. <br /> OWASA Iprefers the extension of the gravity sewer system. The cost <br /> consideration would be made by the developer. It would depend upon the type <br /> of development and fire flow requirements as to whether an 8" water line could <br /> be used or a 12" line is needed for sufficient flow and pressure. <br /> Gordon asked for clarification of the 8" line that was referred to <br /> as a deadend line. Davis responded that a deadend line is one that extends <br /> out to the far reaches of the system without a loop. Davis noted that the <br /> long range development plan for the water system calls for extension of a 12" <br /> along 15 501 which would complete the loop along 15-501 and Smith Level Road. <br /> Yuhaszlinquired about alternative t2 and asked if it would take a <br /> different and perhaps shorter route. Davis responded it would definitely take <br /> a different route: The gravity line would follow the drainage path and be <br /> constantly flowini, downhill. The force main would follow the road right-of- <br /> way so the probleM of obtaining easements would not exist. <br /> Gordon' inquired of Collins on finding 20.3.2(d) referring to <br /> changed conditions why the answer was yes if staff recommended denial. <br /> Collins responded'that this answer should be no. <br /> Roger 1$1aldon, Chapel Hill Planning Director, noted that Collins had <br /> covered the material in the memorandum and there were only a few points he <br /> would like to make. He felt that timing was a definite factor. He expressed <br /> concerns that certain public facilities were missing; water and sewer, fire <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.