Browse
Search
Agenda - 12-03-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 12-03-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:57:15 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
................. <br /> FINDINGS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br /> OERTAINING' TO <br /> APPLICATION: Z-15-85 PARTIN PROPERTY <br /> BASED ON THE APPLICATION MATERIALS SUBMITTED, THE PLANNING STAFF RECOMMEDS THAT 7 ERE IS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE <br /> ,. FOLLOWING FINDINGS: <br /> ARTICLE 20 -'SPECIFIC'STANDARDS'FOR'EVALUATION'0F'RE20NING ("yes" Indicates compliance; "no" indicates non-compliance) <br /> i <br /> PLANNING STAFF FINDINGS PLANNING BOARD <br /> Ordinance Requirements RASED ON APKI CATION._ Evidence Submltted' To Support Findings RECOMMENDED FINDINGS' <br /> Article 7.-4—Ind cates the app)Ica- <br /> tion must first comply with all <br /> requirements specified In Article <br /> 20 - Amendments. Those requirements <br /> include: �. <br /> X Site Plan provided at scale of 1"-100' Yes No <br /> 20.3.2 a) Map.showing affected Yes No . , <br /> property at scale of not less T <br /> than 1" = 100' nor more than i <br /> 1" - 201. !� <br /> 20.3.2 b) Legal description of X Yes No Description provided with application Yes —No <br /> property � <br /> 1. <br /> 20.3.2 c) Explanation of alleged Yes No _Yes No :I <br /> No error alleged. <br /> error, if any, to be corrected ^.. ji <br /> by proposed amendment i) <br /> .i <br /> 20.3.2 d} Changed conditions, if .Yes No Applicant cites the availability of Yes No <br /> any, which make amendment reasona- public utilities, development in the <br /> ably necessary to promote public vicinity and the alteration from a rurallarea <br /> health, safety and general welfare as changed.conditions warranting a rezoning. <br /> i <br /> 20.3.2 e) Manner In which proposed „ Yes No Property is designated as a Twenty Year " ' Yes No f� <br /> amendment will carry out purpose Transition area in the Land' Use Plan. <br /> and Intent of adopted Comprehensive <br /> Plan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.