Agenda - 12-02-1985 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• :... .;;:,...- • MAT 020 M357 Pbezicitywiliz. ktovo5 10 . :.: • in the best interest of the neighborhood; and asked that if approved the Health Department would investigate the park within thee months. David Squires, Jr. expressed concerns regarding traffic impacts and childrens activities in the area; about the quality of people likely to reside . .in the park, and the quality of water supply in the area. 7 Michael ChiOrazzi expressed concerns regarding ' the sketchy plans, site 1 slope and visual problems, traffic, and the nature of the present community to be changed by theipark. • Kent Mann indicated he felt this was a better approach and provided more control that individual lot or subdivision development. . Garrett queStioned the appraisal submitted; noting it was a guess and - I questioned the materials made available to the - appraiser. Be expressed , concerns with not being able to question the appraiser. He noted the appraiser needed access to drawings and plans and cited landscaping plans he had that Tom 1;. ; Squires was given' access to, but that he had not received a request for from the appraiser. • Bledsoe responded at the appraiser had access to everything she had received from staff. 6. SUBDIVISION VEGuLATIogs TEXT AMFINDMENTS - • PRIVATE ROADS . . . . The presentation was made by Marvin Collins. Carl Walters cited the problem encountered by his neighbor in e- bdividing property. • . . . Alton Cummings described his concern and inability to subdivide his land to give his sons ihomesites with a 30' right-of-way versus a 60' right-of-way, • Commissionext Wilhoit asked if a variance could be granted. Smith responded there eere no variances granted to Subdivision Regulations. Commissioner Carey questioned the 60' right-of--way. Susan Smith responded 50' was requiredJ . - Cummings noted the land was to be used for family only. Commissioner Lloyd asked how planning staff could address this. Smith responded staff had . proposed this amendment to address similar problems. Lloyd asked Cummings to contact planning staff to see if what is being proposed will allow him to subdivide his laid. Henry McDon4ld noted he is presently unable to subdivide a lot so as to receive a building permit on land he purchased by deed as he is unable to secure additional access beyond a 12' right-of-way. WATERSHED STANDARDS The presentiltion was made by Marvin Collins. Yuhasz queptioned the difference between the Town proposal which applies the stream buffer standard from the stream versus the County proposal which applies it from' the edge of the flood plain. Collins responded staff proposed that current County Standards dictate. Yuhasz expHssed concern with utilizing United States Geological (USG) maps for applying this standard as they are not intended for this purpose. Commissioned Lloyd noted that this could result in restricting use of many acres of land in certain areas. Yuhasz expressed concern with unnessarily restricting uses allowed under the current floobplain ordinance from occurring and that these proposals are not thought out well. 7. 70,11.1003PINANCE TFX.TaAMENDMENTS7MEATIONAL CODEBRATIVES • The Presere6.tion was made by Planner Susan Smith. Willhoit q+stioned regulating toxic materials. Smith responded it was a provision desired by the Planning Board. Chris Herndal described the needs of the Health Sciences Consortium. Willhoit asked the relationship between use of the facility for staff versus a retreat facility. Herndal responded 20 - 30 full time staff were 1 proposed with some use of the facility for training purposes. No formal presentation was made nor comments received on the remaining public hearing items; Amendments to Article IV-Establishment of Permitted Use