Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
09% <br /> and since th.e Lots had to be split because <br /> the roar; eliminated the oppor.t.unity to <br /> create 101- acre lots she decided to split <br /> the . Lots even smeller in size . She felt <br /> the lots were nicely shaped 'as proposed'. <br /> • VOTE: Unanimous'. - <br /> AGENDA ITEM : AMENDMENTS TO THE SEDIMENTATION An.-[, EROSION <br /> CONTROL ORDINANCE) <br /> Presentation by Faircloth . <br /> fOTI.ON : moved approval of umendm.ents to <br /> • Section;; P and S . <br /> VOTE: • Unanimous [Kramer out of the room . ) <br /> • <br /> • MOTION : Shank Li n moved approval_ of amendments to • <br /> Sections 4-15 . Pearson seconded the <br /> motion . <br /> • <br /> VOTE: Unanimous (Kramer out of the room . ) <br /> NOTION : Shenk Lin moved approval of amendments. to <br /> • • Sections 17-22. Pearson seconded the • <br /> motion . <br /> largison inquired if the fine was $100 <br /> day . Faire Loth responded that each day <br /> constituted a separate violation and <br /> therefore each day could represent a fine <br /> of $100 .00 . <br /> Gordon inquired what was meant be civil. <br /> penalties . Fair-cloth responder that in <br /> some cases , particularly in •the state <br /> enforcement of state—wide ordinance , <br /> negotiations take place on settic:Grent> for <br /> violations . He noted that nothing <br /> comparable had ever occurred in Orange <br /> County during his tenure . He suggested <br /> that the intention here was to clarify he <br /> fines are imposed and on what basis . <br /> Pearson noted that the penalty could net <br /> exceed $100. DLi a violation . He added that <br /> court action could be taken to obtain <br /> damages as welt in addition to the fines <br /> Fn•i r cloth noted that no fines had been <br /> imposed in Granite. County in throe` yet rs <br /> Sher:i: Lio inquired about the Scott coon . <br /> FaircLeth rioted that that situation was a <br /> violation of a different pollution <br />