Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:47:53 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATIGRO LANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) <br /> Planning Staff Planning Board <br /> Ordinance Requirements Findings Evidence Submitted To Support Findings Findings <br /> Article 7.1 +.3 sets forth "site <br /> planning" standards with which <br /> an applicant must comply. <br /> Standards regarding "external _- <br /> - r-e-lat-lonsh-i-ps—are-as-fol-l-oviv. <br /> a)1. Access points provided to Yes No All traffic will obtain access to the site Yes No <br /> encourage smooth traffic via White Cross Road (SR 1951). Applicant <br /> Flow with controlled turn- proposes to use the existing entrance to the site. <br /> ing movements and minimum No minor streets are affected by the proposed development. <br /> hazard to vehicular or <br /> pedestrian traffic. Use of <br /> minor streets by substan- <br /> tial traffic is discouraged. <br /> a)2, Safe and convenient routes es No Applicant has indicated safe pedestrian Yes No <br /> provided for pedestrians � routes through the development. <br /> and motorcyclists. Crossings <br /> safely marked, located and <br /> controlled. <br /> a)3. Visibility provided at inter- X Yes No Visibility looking south from the entrance Yes No <br /> sections (pedestrian and vehicular) is adequate. Visibility looking north is in accordance with Article 6.8. 425 feet and could be Improved significantly If brush on the back- <br /> slope to the north of the entrance was cut back and maintained. <br /> 04. 100-foot open space provided Yes No Yes No <br /> along perimeter of PD-H district. -li- Adjacent property is slmilarly zoned and may— <br /> Recreational use and off-street be developed at the same densityin accordance with setback <br /> parking set back at least 75 feet requirements; 100' open space is,therefore, not required. <br /> of district boundary. <br /> a)5. Yards, fences, walks or X Yes No Applicant proposed to retain as much existing Yes No <br /> vegetation provided to screen "" — natural vegetation as possible. individual --- ----- <br /> off undesirable views, light- parking spaces and refuse collection are proposed <br /> ing, noise, etc. Parking/ with no specific screening required or provided. <br /> loading areas and refuse collec- <br /> tion/storage areas screened. <br /> C� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.