Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:47:53 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O <br /> 4 <br /> ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNr D DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) cc <br /> CD <br /> Planning Staff Planning Board <br /> Ordinance Requirements Findings Evidence Submitted To Support Findings F(ndinas <br /> Article 7.4 then indicates the <br /> application must comply with <br /> certain specific requirements <br /> common to all Planned Develop- <br /> ments. These include: — ----- - <br /> 7.4.1 so located with respect to X Yes No Direct access is provided via White Cross Yes No <br /> major streets and mass transit Road (SR1951). White Cross Road is a <br /> Facilities and designed so as not state-maintained road classified as a <br /> to create traffic on minor streets collector road. No minor residential streets <br /> in residential districts will be affected by this project as designed. <br /> 7.4.2 so located with respect to X Yes No Applicant proposes a community well system Yes No <br /> hater, sewer, and storm drainage and a spray irrigation wastewater disposal <br /> facilities that enlargement or facility to serve the site. Cost of <br /> extension will not result in installation is to be borne by the applicant. <br /> Higher net public cost or earlier <br /> incursion of public cost <br /> and <br /> So located with respect to X Yes No Letters regarding adequate service _Yes No <br /> police, fire and rescue services, provision have been received from police, fire and <br /> and schools and parks so as to rescue services. The service level will not change <br /> have access in the same manner as existing zoning/density A s not proposed to change. <br /> as permitted under the existing <br /> zoning <br /> 7.4.3 Site suitable for develop- L-Yes No Soli survey/topographic/flood maps indicate Yes No <br /> menL without hazard from flooding, small stream crossing site on remaining <br /> erosion, and soil subsidence or acreage not proposed for development. ' <br /> slipping <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.