Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:47:53 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- i <br /> 1 <br /> ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 000081 <br /> xrrrsBOROUGH <br /> NORTH CAROLINA. <br /> 27278 <br /> ° q q <br /> it621 <br /> N coo' <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Eddie Kirk, Planner <br /> FROM: Warren Faircloth, Erosion Control Office& <br /> SUBJECT: Proposed Scottswood Development <br /> DATE: November 21 , 1985 <br /> I have reviewed the plans for this proposal and have <br /> the following comments. <br /> The floodplain boundries and the drainage easements <br /> should Abe surveyed and plotted on the plat for <br /> accuracy. The topo maps should not be used as a <br /> basis for establishing these features. Additional <br /> drainage easments are needed on the smaller water- <br /> courses; I can point these out to you on the plans. <br /> If necessary, drainage easements will be needed <br /> between lots to carry runoff from some of the longer <br /> streets to the watercourses instead on channeling the <br /> water down the streets. <br /> The effects of the increased runoff from this devel- <br /> opment, particularly the commercial and multi—family <br /> parts, on the downstream property should be investi- <br /> gated. .) <br /> The erosion control needs more attention . The <br /> proposed single family will require more work, but <br /> adequate space seems to be available in most places <br /> to accommodate the needed controls . The one excep- <br /> tion is at the location of Cameron Circle along the <br /> stream at lots 317-322 and at the end of Argyll Way. <br /> Adequate room between the street construction and the <br /> stream does not appear to be provided. The commer- <br /> cial and multi—family parts have not left adequate <br /> room in the most Logical location for accommodating <br /> erosion control devices . The potential Locations for <br /> sediment ponds for both of these areas are taken up <br /> by either roadways or buffers. These need attention <br /> before the plans are approved and it. becomes <br /> difficult to change the plans . <br /> Is the existing pipe under U.S. _Z.D--adequate to carry <br /> the increased runoff from this site? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.