Orange County NC Website
I <br /> a-a : <br /> 10 <br /> She questioned the use of the buffer zones and if these would maintain or <br /> -2; <br /> . enhance the value of contiguous property as required for a Special Use Permit. <br /> She expressed concern about the increased traffic that would be placed on St. <br /> Mary's Road which is already dangerous. She expressed dismay that the traffic <br /> impact report states that the intersection is not yet at capacity. The <br /> development call for Carolina Avenue to be closed at the west end which would <br /> route traffic back in front of the existinl homes on Carolina Avenue. Ms. <br /> Roberts asked if this increase in traffic on the dirt road would maintain or <br /> enhance the value of contiguous property. There are already seven buses that <br /> travel on this road daily. The addition of 300+ children would add to that <br /> traffic. She asked that the Board of Commissioners think very seriously about <br /> the impact that a development of this magnitude will have on the citizens of <br /> the area. She is not against development but prefers it to be limited to one <br /> house per acre so that it is more compatible with the adjoining property as <br /> well as to lesseri the impact on traffic/ schools and water consumption. <br /> Mayor !Frank Sheffield expressed concerns about the development that <br /> : mainly stem from the size of the project and the additional services that will <br /> be required. With regard to the traffic impact it seems that there must be a <br /> traffic problem biefore the road improvements are in place and it would seem <br /> that the road improvements should be in place prior to or concurrent with the <br /> ''' development. He agrees with the citizens that stated that Highway 70 is <br /> already at capacity and is a crowded highway. Be noted this would aggravate <br /> ' • <br /> the dangerous situation in front of Cameron Park School. With regard to water <br /> consumption/ it is true that the TOwn currently has water and sewage treatment <br /> capacity to handle the project but the concern is that this will use a fairly <br /> large portion o4 what is remaining and that it, coupled with several other <br /> projects that are planned or already approved/ would essentially use up most <br /> ( if not all the available capacity. He expressed an uncertainty that the Town <br /> 7., would have the resources to expand the plant. The other problems in the long <br /> runt would be the raw water shortage problem. Plans need to be in place to <br /> assure raw water supply to handle this project and future projects. The <br /> infrastructure and support facilities that are necessary for a project of this <br /> size need to be in place or taking place at the current rate of development. <br /> Sheffield explained that, at the time the project was discussed by the Town <br /> Council, they had not included in their water and sewer policy the requirement <br /> of annexation. The Town Council has since adopted that policy and is <br /> requesting voluntary annexation of this development. <br /> John McAdams indicated the applicant would readily petition the <br /> Town of HillsboroUgh for annexation on a phased-in basis. <br /> Marvin Collins made reference to an earlier question from Barry <br /> T, <br /> Jacobs about the previous proposed plan for this property and stated that in <br /> 1980 the development was for 247 single family lots with an average lot size <br /> of one acre. <br /> ' Planning Board member Barry Jacobs asked that Chapter VIII on <br /> t, <br /> incentive zoning from the ZomireLand LADO Use Controls Book by Patrick Rohan <br /> pages 2-7 and 45- 4 be entered into the record. These excerpts are on file in <br /> the permanent genda file in the Clerk's office. Jacobs explained that <br /> .. incentive zoning I delineates the fact that planned developments are a form of <br /> incentive zoning by which a municipality attempts to negotiate a type of <br /> clustered housing and the most efficient use of land on a particular <br /> development. It is relevant in terms of the purpose for a planned development <br /> ordinance. <br /> Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissioner <br /> •Marshall to continue the public hearing on the Scotswood development to <br /> January 6, 1986 to allow additional time for the Planning Staff to evaluate <br /> 1 <br /> the new information about the availability of water resources and to possibly <br /> develop a plan for staging of development in order to address the concerns in <br /> , that area/ to look at the data available for the raw water usage by the public <br /> utility providers which may change the recommendation/ to review the <br /> • <br />