Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-25-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-25-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:47:53 AM
Creation date
9/14/2016 9:32:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/25/1985
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
? • <br /> 9 <br /> With reference to the comments made in a letter from NCDOT, McAdams <br /> indicated the applicant does concur with everything as stated in the letter. <br /> Planning Board member David Shanklin asked about mail delivery and <br /> McAdams indicated that the single family dwellings would be served by a rural <br /> mail route and that in the multi-family dwellings a mail gazebo would be <br /> provided. Therel will also be dumpster locations within the multi-family area <br /> and a private collection service for the single-family area. <br /> KM210.--gLaMEMMIELCITURE <br /> Tom Metzer, resident of the vicinity of the proposed project, <br /> expressed concern about (1) adequate water resources. (2) human services, <br /> including law enforcement. (3) classrooms, teachers, etc., and (4) roadways. <br /> He commented that the traffic pattern in that area has increased over the last <br /> six years. <br /> Ron Hyatt, member of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee, <br /> expressed concerns about the proposed recreation area. With regard to the <br /> 1 <br /> size and locationv all the proposed recreational area along Nancy Hill Creek <br /> is in the floodgain and would not provide for those activities of an active <br /> nature. He asked that consideration be given to another three acres south of <br /> the designated recreation area that would be more suitable. This would <br /> provide additional safety and lend itself to a variety of activities. The <br /> type of soil along the creek has been described as wetlands which may be the <br /> type of soil that would need additional support. <br /> Mr. C. D. Snith, area resident, questioned condition #2 which <br /> states "landscaping and mulching around all mobile home units" and if this was <br /> in fact a mobile home park. <br /> Marvin Collins indicated that reference should be deleted. <br /> Smith indicated the residents in the area of Crawford Road would <br /> prefer to have tbe hones facing St. Mary's Road so the present homes would not <br /> have to look at the backside of the proposed homes. He requested that the <br /> development be corpatible with what is now on St. Mary's Road and that there <br /> be 150 foot wide lots facing St. Mary's Road. He voiced no objection to the <br /> development, but ' ants to be proud of what is built. <br /> Joyce Brown questioned the adequacy of the water supply for the <br /> development, the raffic problems and the amount of noise and pollution of the <br /> air. She asked *f the present sites for garbage disposal would be adeqpate, <br /> questioned the increased toxins at the landfill and the impact on the land <br /> values. She stated that taxes are already extremely high and development of <br /> this kind will inflate present prices and values in the area. She asked that <br /> the County stop and see what new projects have been approved and look at the <br /> impacts on the environment and the quality of life. <br /> Jane Gaede, resident of Highway 70 near St. Mary's Road, voiced <br /> opposition to the project. She listed four (4) major concerns: (1) traffic - <br /> Highway 70 is already dangerous; allowing additional traffic on the corner of <br /> Highway 70 and St. Mary's Road would make an already hazardous situation <br /> severely dangerous. (2) water - adequate water supply, (3) schools - already <br /> crowded and the additional tax base from the development would not pay for <br /> additional facilities necessary. and (4) crime - will increase the demand on <br /> the Sheriff's Department to provide protection. She expressed concern that <br /> Hillsborough willibe ruined if development is not stopped. <br /> Mr. C J. Andrews, representative of the Hillsborough Historical <br /> Society, expressed concern about the traffic problem on East King Street and <br /> Churton Street. The Historical Society is concerned for the people who come <br /> to visit Historic Hillsborough and walk from one area to another and the <br /> 1 <br /> dangerous situation that will be produced by increased traffic. <br /> Ms. 1.4Vian Roberts, resident of Carolina Avenue which borders the <br /> proposed developinet, does not object to development but does oppose the <br /> Scotswood project because of the magnitude and impacts on the traffic and <br /> schools. On the proposal to rezone single family housing area from R1 to R2, <br /> most of the other homes bordering the project are built on one acre lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.