Orange County NC Website
I <br /> • . <br /> 8-51 INCENTIVE ZONING §•8.03[2] <br /> • an unconstitutional"taking"of property;6(2)that in particular cases • <br /> bonus zoning bears no rational relation to the exercise of the police <br /> • power;' (3)that such zoning constitutes a denial of equal protection <br /> of the laws;a and (4) that the various state enabling acts do not <br /> . authorize municipalities to enact bonus zoning provision.9 <br /> • <br /> [2]--Constitutional Objections . <br /> (a]- "°rig"by Unreasonable FAR. Incentive zoning plans, <br /> in order to encourage builders to include public amenities in their <br /> construction projects, commonly award bonuses in the form of in. • <br /> • creased floor area ratio(FAR).t°Most builders will not benefit from <br /> such a plan,however,if the underlying or"residual"FAR.(the FAR <br /> _ to which the builder!will be subject if he does not choose to provide - <br /> , • amenities) differs little from the bonus FAR. Thus, there is the <br /> • danger that sortie municipalities may reduce the residual FAR to an <br /> . <br /> . ' ! excessively low level so as to encourage developers to apply for the <br /> bonus.tt . • <br /> . <br /> Civello v.New Orleans. 154 La.271,284-285;Best v.Zoning Bd.of Adjustment, <br /> 393 Pa. 106,116-117;State ex rel.Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. Wieland 269 <br /> •b - - •• Wis.262,271-27Z cert.deli.350 U.S.841; Churchill&Tait V.Rafferty, 32 P. <br /> L 580,app.dsmd.248 U.S.591;see,also,8 McQuillan,Municipal Corporations <br /> r [3d ed.] § 25.31.) As Mr. Justice Douglas, writing for a unanimous court in <br /> Berman, put it(348 U. S.,at p. 33): <br /> • "`The concept of the public welfare is broad and inclusive.s**The values <br /> , it represents are spiritual as well as physical,aesthetic as well as monetary. <br /> It is within the power of the legislature to determine that the community <br /> should be beautiful as well as healthy,spacious as well as clean,well-balanced • <br /> as well as carefully patrolled. a a • If those who govern the District of <br /> Columbia decide that the Nation's Capital should be beautiful as well <br /> . as sanitary, there is nothing in the Fifth Amendment that stands in the <br /> way,.. <br /> For a detailed discussion of Aesthetic Zoning,see Ch. 16 infra. <br /> - 6 See§8.03[2] [a] infra <br /> r See§8.03[2] [b] infra. <br /> 9 Sea§8.03 [2] [c] infra <br /> • 9 See§ 8.03[3] infra. <br /> . 1C As noted previously (see § 8.01[4] supra), the FAR regulates the physical <br /> volume of a building.The FAR is the ratio which the floor area within a building <br /> bears to the area of ground covered by the building.More floor area generally means <br /> more rentable space for a developer and thus potentially higher-profits on his <br /> investment. <br /> as In San Francisco,for example,residual FAIL in office districts was reduced to <br /> (Zoning Low) <br /> i <br /> 4 ' <br /> . <br /> �i. ''' �^ <br />