Orange County NC Website
8-3 • INcENTivE ZONING § 8.01[2] <br /> failure of traditional zoning to take an affirmative approach toward <br /> land use control has resulted in irregular and fragmented growth of <br /> urban areas and the lack of adequate amenities,such as parking and <br /> open spy.s <br /> In recent years, there has been an increasing effort by urban plan- <br /> ners to encourage private developers to make cities more attractive, <br /> . - j and to provide increased public amenities and conveniences. One of • <br /> the land use techniques that has been successfully employed to ac- <br /> complish this objective is incentive or bonus zoning.6 Incentive zon- <br /> ing has encouraged otherwise uneconomic development in accord- <br /> ance with urban design policies selected by the municipality.' <br /> [2]—Incentive or Bonus Zoning Defined <br /> Incentive or bonus zoning is a land use control technique by which <br /> a builder or developer agrees to provide certain amenities that the <br /> For regulations designed to regulate the cubic content of a building,or the ratio <br /> between floor area and lot area(the FAR)as important density control devices,see <br /> Frischkorn Construe. Co. v. Lambert, 385 Mich 556, 24 NW2d 209(1946).The <br /> FA technique is discussed in § 8.01[4] infra. <br /> 1 - R_ 5 See Benson,"Bonus or Incentive Zoning--Legal Implications,"21 Syracuse L <br /> Rev 895 (1970) where the author notes that "the failure of traditional land use <br /> control can be seers in the dreary,monotonous suburban developments which have <br /> sprung up around every major city in the country,or in sterile,monolithic office <br /> buildings in which hundreds of people work and through which hundreds more pass <br /> daily and in which no provisions have been made for parking spaces,food service, <br /> public rest rooms,public telephones, or simply a place to sit down." <br /> 6 See Costonis, "The Chicago Plan: Incentive Zoning and the Preservation of <br /> -Urban Landmarks," 85 Hary L Rev 574(1972). <br /> 7 For a general discussion of incentive zoning theory and techniques,see Marcus <br /> and Groves, The New Zoning:LegaL Adniintttrative, and Economic Concepts and <br /> Techniques(Praeger Publishers, 1970)[hereinafter called New Zoning];6 Powell on <br /> Real Property, 1(865.4(Matthew Bender&Co.);Freilich,"Awakening the Sleeping <br /> Giant:New Trends and Developments in Environmental and Land Use Controls," <br /> 1974 Institute on Planning. Zoning and Eminent Domain 1 (SW Legal Found, <br /> Matthew Bender&Co.);Marcus, "Mandatory Development Rights Transfer and <br /> the Taking Clause:The Case of Manhattan's Tudor City Parks,"24 Buffalo L Rev <br /> ! <br /> I 77 (1974); Costonis, "'Fair' Compensation and the Accomodation Power: An- <br /> _ tidotes For the Taking Impasse in Land Use Controversies,"75 Colum L Rev 1021 <br /> (1975); Elliott and Marcus, "From Euclid to Ramapo: New Directions in Land <br /> Development Controls," 1 Hofstra L Rev 56(1973);Benson."Bonus or Incentive <br /> Zoning—Legal Implications," 21 Syracuse L Rev 895 (1970). <br /> . - (Zoning Law) • <br /> r-0 ...1---1-4".1""'"' <br /> ',, y .v., • <br />