Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-19-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:39:09 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 4:33:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> Scoring Sheet <br /> PO <br /> IL, Development is Wells sad Septic Teaks: Rural Buffer <br /> IS-s That type of development should occur in areas where public water and sewer <br /> service is'not expected to be available for at least 2fl years?Choose from list below. <br /> , � x_0 . 5 �.Alternative t: Allow development using wells and septic tanks, with <br /> approximately one acre minimum lot size(as is currently allowed) <br /> `' , $ -3 - 3 1_Alteraative 2: Allow development using wells and septic tanks. with <br /> two acre minimum lot size <br /> $ _3 -q ._Alternative 3: Otherpolicy(specify) 13i nit per35 eves <br /> 1 5 Other 2--2.-1 <br /> N <br /> 1-0 -- 1 _..�!)on't know <br /> yR <br /> I - © -° More then one alternative <br /> 111-b In el reas with poor soil for septic tank systems,two drainage fields could be <br /> required per lot(o-M primary field and one'back-up').Do you favor such a policy? <br /> 3-o-1 4.2-0 3-a_0 t-a'p <br /> Yes —____Neutral _.— No ._Don't know —1--NR <br /> 11. Development en Wells sad Septic Teaks: Transition Ares.. <br /> 11-a In some areas public water and sewer service is not now available,but is <br /> expected tol be available within 10 years. Should development in these areas be <br /> allowed using wells and septic tanks.with approximately one acre minimum lot size <br /> (as is currently allowed)? <br /> $ 9 1 -7-3-3. / -a--o 3.l-1 <br /> l l�k If it Yes '7 Neutral - 1 WO _Don't know — --N R <br /> ypu answered No in item 11-e,above,which alternative would you favor? <br /> f. 5' 1 ' I— —.Alternative l: Prohibit development using wells and septic tents <br /> and,allow development only when water and sewer service can be extended. <br /> If you choose this alternative,what types of land uses would you allow in these <br /> areas? <br /> - q-2 - I _ Alternative 2: Allow development using wells and septic tanks,with <br /> f two acre minimum lot size. <br /> rnative 3: Allow development using wells and septic tanks, <br /> f with one acre minimum lot size but require installation of"dug"water and <br /> sewer lines which can be connected when service is available. <br /> t + L 1 Alternative 4: Other policy(specify) <br /> I -0 0 `e then one alternative citosen- <br /> 12. Raul System <br /> 12-a Do ydu believe there are any problems with the road system in Chapel Hill and <br /> surrounding Joint Planning Area? <br /> .23-6 -iz 0-0-1 1-0-0 <br /> . Yas ____1__—Neutral I No _Don't know --.µR <br /> 4* 12-h If your answer is Yes in item 12-a above,please describe the problems using <br /> the following categories: <br /> Location of roads. l 7 II- 3 - 3. <br /> Size of rook 17 q- _ it - <br /> Amount of traffic r_ /0-3- R- - <br /> Other(specify)._j12 $_;_3_:_, ______, - , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.