Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-04-1985
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Agenda - 11-04-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 8:33:48 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 3:55:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/4/1985
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
241
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARTICLE 7 - SPECIFIC STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION/PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS (Continued) <br /> ____—___--__--__--• _ _ BOARD- OF <br /> PLANNING BOARD - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS <br /> Ordinance Requirements RFC0MMF.NDF.D.FINDINGS Evidence'Submitted To Support Findings FiIl4�1'!GS <br /> iii-- <br /> Article 7.14.3 standards <br /> continued: - <br /> a}6. Maximum buildin g X Yes No <br /> Maximum building height in R-2 district Yes No <br /> height complibs with is 25'. ' Development summary Indicates <br /> standards set forth dimensional standard. Individual units' <br /> In Article 6.12.3 and compliance to be determined upon issuance of ' <br /> Article 5. 1. 1 a building permit. <br /> a}7. Signs to be erected In Yes No A Yes No <br /> accordance with Article 9. pplicant indicates sign details and <br /> location which comply with the provislbns <br /> Standards regarding "Internal of Article 9 which specifies a maximum sign <br /> relationships" are as follows: area' of 16 square feet. <br /> b} 1 . Streets, drives and parking Yes No Applicant proposes a 33' public road, Yes No <br /> areas provide safe and con- Sweeten Creek Road, as the primary road <br /> venient access for dwellings serving the development. Two cul-de-sans <br /> and emergency vehicles, and two stub-outs are also proposed. As <br /> and do not create small designed, the proposed public streets rovide <br /> block sizes. safe and convenient access to dwelling units. <br /> b}2. Vehicular access controlled <br /> as follows: <br /> a} Streets serving 50 or Yes No 1j1e •proposed cul-de-sacs and stub outs Yes ' No <br /> less dwellings provide provide access to lots served by private <br /> direct access to parking/ drives as proposed In the typical lot detail ' <br /> service area s <br /> s. �• • .•.. .. .. <br /> ' <br /> Streets serving greater " a X Yes No Sweeten Creek Road provides access to ..._.Yes No <br /> than 50 dwellings provide lots served by private drives as proposed <br /> access to parking areas so jn the typical lot details. Staff recommends <br /> located, designed and that the parking area serving the recreation <br /> controlled as to channel area and accessed by this road be' redesigned <br /> traffic without Interruption. to minimize traffic Interruption on Sweeten' <br /> }3. Walkways form safe, con- X Yes No Creek Road. Yes r No <br /> venient system of access to Pedestrian ,walkways are Rrovided'which <br /> dwellings, facilities and satisfy this requirment. <br /> off-site designations. <br /> Maximum walking distance <br /> between dwellings and parking; <br /> delivery and refuse collection ; <br /> areas does not exceed 100 feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.